BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2019
CVE-2019-18292High confidence

A vulnerability has been identified in SPPA-T3000 MS3000 Migration Server (All versions)

Siemens · SPPA-T3000 MS3000 Migration Server

7.5HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Mitigation available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Critical, raised one band.upgradedsince 5 Aug 2024

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • A structured source references public exploit or proof-of-concept material.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 2.50% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Apply the linked authoritative mitigation while planning the permanent fix.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Increase monitoring for the attack path and post-exploitation behaviour described in the report.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Siemens SPPA-T3000 MS3000 Migration Server and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Recheck the vendor advisory before scheduling a change because no verified fixed version is currently retained.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 3 daysRemediation target: Within 90 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2019-8081

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Mitigation available
01

What, why and how

A vulnerability has been identified in SPPA-T3000 MS3000 Migration Server (All versions). An attacker with network access to the MS3000 Server could trigger a Denial-of-Service condition by sending specifically crafted packets to port 5010/tcp. This vulnerability is independent from CVE-2019-18290, CVE-2019-18291, CVE-2019-18294, CVE-2019-18298, CVE-2019-18299, CVE-2019-18300, CVE-2019-18301, CVE-2019-18302, CVE-2019-18303, CVE-2019-18304, CVE-2019-18305, CVE-2019-18306, and CVE-2019-18307. Please note that an attacker needs to have network access to the MS3000 in order to exploit this vulnerability. At the time of advisory publication no public exploitation of this security vulnerability was known.

What

A vulnerability has been identified in SPPA-T3000 MS3000 Migration Server (All versions). An attacker with network access to the MS3000 Server could trigger a Denial-of-Service condition by sending specifically crafted packets to port 5010/tcp. This vulnerability is independent from CVE-2019-18290, CVE-2019-18291, CVE-2019-18294, CVE-2019-18298, CVE-2019-18299, CVE-2019-18300, CVE-2019-18301, CVE-2019-18302, CVE-2019-18303, CVE-2019-18304, CVE-2019-18305, CVE-2019-18306, and CVE-2019-18307. Please note that an attacker needs to have network access to the MS3000 in order to exploit this vulnerability. At the time of advisory publication no public exploitation of this security vulnerability was known.

Why

A heap overflow condition is a buffer overflow, where the buffer that can be overwritten is allocated in the heap portion of memory, generally meaning that the buffer was allocated using a routine such as malloc().

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

A vulnerability has been identified in SPPA-T3000 MS3000 Migration Server (All versions). An attacker with network access to the MS3000 Server could trigger a Denial-of-Service condition by sending specifically crafted packets to port 5010/tcp. This vulnerability is independent from CVE-2019-18290, CVE-2019-18291, CVE-2019-18294, CVE-2019-18298, CVE-2019-18299, CVE-2019-18300, CVE-2019-18301, CVE-2019-18302, CVE-2019-18303, CVE-2019-18304, CVE-2019-18305, CVE-2019-18306, and CVE-2019-18307. Please note that an attacker needs to have network access to the MS3000 in order to exploit this vulnerability. At the time of advisory publication no public exploitation of this security vulnerability was known.

Why

A heap overflow condition is a buffer overflow, where the buffer that can be overwritten is allocated in the heap portion of memory, generally meaning that the buffer was allocated using a routine such as malloc().

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
Reference recorded

A structured CVE source labels at least one public reference as exploit material. BlackTree has not independently validated that it is safe, reliable or weaponised.

Likely attack path
a network path → Heap-based Buffer Overflow → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-122 ↗

CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow. A heap overflow condition is a buffer overflow, where the buffer that can be overwritten is allocated in the heap portion of memory, generally meaning that the buffer was allocated using a routine such as malloc().

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-122Public exploit reference
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2019-AVI-615Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

d?id=CVE-2019-13932 Référence CVE CVE-2019-13942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-13942 Référence CVE CVE-2019-13943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-13943 Référence CVE CVE-2019-13944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-13944 Référence CVE CVE-2019-13945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-13945 Référence CVE CVE-2019-13947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-13947 Référence CVE CVE-2019-18283 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-18283 Référence CVE CVE-2019-18290 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-18290 Référence CVE CVE-2019-18291 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-18291 Référence CVE CVE-2019-18292 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-18292 Référence CVE CVE-2019-18294 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-18294 Référence CVE CVE-2019-18298 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-18298 Référence CVE CVE-2019-18299 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-18299 Référence CVE CVE-2019-18300 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-18300 Référence CVE CVE-2019-18301 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-18301 Référence CVE CVE-2019-18302 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-18302 Référence CVE CVE-2019-18303 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-18303 Référence CVE CVE-2019-18304 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2019-013223SPPA-T3000 MS3000 Migration Server における境界外書き込みに関する脆弱性

SPPA-T3000 MS3000 Migration Server には、境界外書き込みに関する脆弱性が存在します。 本脆弱性は、CVE-2019-18290、CVE-2019-18291、CVE-2019-18292、CVE-2019-18298、CVE-2019-18299、CVE-2019-18300、CVE-2019-18301、CVE-2019-18302、CVE-2019-18303、CVE-2019-18304、CVE-2019-18305、CVE-2019-18306、CVE-2019-18307 とは異なる脆弱性です。

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2019-013219SPPA-T3000 MS3000 Migration Server における整数オーバーフローの脆弱性

SPPA-T3000 MS3000 Migration Server には、整数オーバーフローの脆弱性、および境界外書き込みに関する脆弱性が存在します。 本脆弱性は、CVE-2019-18290、CVE-2019-18291、CVE-2019-18292、CVE-2019-18294、CVE-2019-18299、CVE-2019-18300、CVE-2019-18301、CVE-2019-18302、CVE-2019-18303、CVE-2019-18304、CVE-2019-18305、CVE-2019-18306、CVE-2019-18307 とは異なる脆弱性です。

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2019-013218SPPA-T3000 MS3000 Migration Server における境界外書き込みに関する脆弱性

SPPA-T3000 MS3000 Migration Server には、境界外書き込みに関する脆弱性、および整数オーバーフローの脆弱性が存在します。 本脆弱性は、CVE-2019-18290、CVE-2019-18291、CVE-2019-18292、CVE-2019-18294、CVE-2019-18298、CVE-2019-18300、CVE-2019-18301、CVE-2019-18302、CVE-2019-18303、CVE-2019-18304、CVE-2019-18305、CVE-2019-18306、CVE-2019-18307 とは異なる脆弱性です。

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2019-013215SPPA-T3000 MS3000 Migration Server における境界外書き込みに関する脆弱性

SPPA-T3000 MS3000 Migration Server には、境界外書き込みに関する脆弱性が存在します。 本脆弱性は、CVE-2019-18290、CVE-2019-18292、CVE-2019-18294、CVE-2019-18298、CVE-2019-18299、CVE-2019-18300、CVE-2019-18301、CVE-2019-18302、CVE-2019-18303、CVE-2019-18304、CVE-2019-18305、CVE-2019-18306、CVE-2019-18307 とは異なる脆弱性です。

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2019-013214SPPA-T3000 MS3000 Migration Server における境界外書き込みに関する脆弱性

SPPA-T3000 MS3000 Migration Server には、境界外書き込みに関する脆弱性が存在します。 本脆弱性は、CVE-2019-18291、CVE-2019-18292、CVE-2019-18294、CVE-2019-18298、CVE-2019-18299、CVE-2019-18300、CVE-2019-18301、CVE-2019-18302、CVE-2019-18303、CVE-2019-18304、CVE-2019-18305、CVE-2019-18306、CVE-2019-18307 とは異なる脆弱性です。

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2019-013213SPPA-T3000 MS3000 Migration Server における整数オーバーフローの脆弱性

SPPA-T3000 MS3000 Migration Server には、整数オーバーフローの脆弱性が存在します。 本脆弱性は、CVE-2019-18290、CVE-2019-18291、CVE-2019-18292、CVE-2019-18294、CVE-2019-18298、CVE-2019-18299、CVE-2019-18301、CVE-2019-18302、CVE-2019-18303、CVE-2019-18304、CVE-2019-18305、CVE-2019-18306、CVE-2019-18307 とは異なる脆弱性です。

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2019-013212SPPA-T3000 MS3000 Migration Server における整数オーバーフローの脆弱性

SPPA-T3000 MS3000 Migration Server には、整数オーバーフローの脆弱性が存在します。 本脆弱性は、CVE-2019-18290、CVE-2019-18291、CVE-2019-18292、CVE-2019-18294、CVE-2019-18298、CVE-2019-18299、CVE-2019-18300、CVE-2019-18302、CVE-2019-18303、CVE-2019-18304、CVE-2019-18305、CVE-2019-18306、CVE-2019-18307 とは異なる脆弱性です。

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2019-013211SPPA-T3000 MS3000 Migration Server における整数オーバーフローの脆弱性

SPPA-T3000 MS3000 Migration Server には、整数オーバーフローの脆弱性が存在します。 本脆弱性は、CVE-2019-18290、CVE-2019-18291、CVE-2019-18292、CVE-2019-18294、CVE-2019-18298、CVE-2019-18299、CVE-2019-18300、CVE-2019-18301、CVE-2019-18303、CVE-2019-18304、CVE-2019-18305、CVE-2019-18306、CVE-2019-18307 とは異なる脆弱性です。

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2019-013210SPPA-T3000 MS3000 Migration Server における境界外読み取りに関する脆弱性

SPPA-T3000 MS3000 Migration Server には、境界外読み取りに関する脆弱性、および境界外書き込みに関する脆弱性が存在します。 本脆弱性は、CVE-2019-18290、CVE-2019-18291、CVE-2019-18292、CVE-2019-18294、CVE-2019-18298、CVE-2019-18299、CVE-2019-18300、CVE-2019-18301、CVE-2019-18302、CVE-2019-18303、CVE-2019-18304、CVE-2019-18305、CVE-2019-18307 とは異なる脆弱性です。

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2019-013209SPPA-T3000 MS3000 Migration Server における整数オーバーフローの脆弱性

SPPA-T3000 MS3000 Migration Server には、整数オーバーフローの脆弱性が存在します。 本脆弱性は、CVE-2019-18290、CVE-2019-18291、CVE-2019-18292、CVE-2019-18294、CVE-2019-18298、CVE-2019-18299、CVE-2019-18300、CVE-2019-18301、CVE-2019-18302、CVE-2019-18303、CVE-2019-18305、CVE-2019-18306、CVE-2019-18307 とは異なる脆弱性です。

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2019-013208SPPA-T3000 MS3000 Migration Server における整数オーバーフローの脆弱性

SPPA-T3000 MS3000 Migration Server には、整数オーバーフローの脆弱性が存在します。 本脆弱性は、CVE-2019-18290、CVE-2019-18291、CVE-2019-18292、CVE-2019-18294、CVE-2019-18298、CVE-2019-18299、CVE-2019-18300、CVE-2019-18301、CVE-2019-18302、CVE-2019-18304、CVE-2019-18305、CVE-2019-18306、CVE-2019-18307 とは異なる脆弱性です。

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2019-013116SPPA-T3000 MS3000 Migration Server における境界外書き込みに関する脆弱性

SPPA-T3000 MS3000 Migration Server には、境界外書き込みに関する脆弱性が存在します。 本脆弱性は、CVE-2019-18290、CVE-2019-18291、CVE-2019-18294、CVE-2019-18298、CVE-2019-18299、CVE-2019-18300、CVE-2019-18301、CVE-2019-18302、CVE-2019-18303、CVE-2019-18304、CVE-2019-18305、CVE-2019-18306、CVE-2019-18307 とは異なる脆弱性です。

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2019-013113SPPA-T3000 MS3000 Migration Server における境界外読み取りに関する脆弱性

SPPA-T3000 MS3000 Migration Server には、境界外読み取りに関する脆弱性が存在します。 本脆弱性は、CVE-2019-18290、CVE-2019-18291、CVE-2019-18292、CVE-2019-18294、CVE-2019-18298、CVE-2019-18299、CVE-2019-18300、CVE-2019-18301、CVE-2019-18302、CVE-2019-18303、CVE-2019-18304、CVE-2019-18305、CVE-2019-18306 とは異なる脆弱性です。

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2019-013112SPPA-T3000 MS3000 Migration Server における整数オーバーフローの脆弱性

SPPA-T3000 MS3000 Migration Server には、整数オーバーフローの脆弱性が存在します。 本脆弱性は、CVE-2019-18290、CVE-2019-18291、CVE-2019-18292、CVE-2019-18294、CVE-2019-18298、CVE-2019-18299、CVE-2019-18300、CVE-2019-18301、CVE-2019-18302、CVE-2019-18303、CVE-2019-18304、CVE-2019-18306、CVE-2019-18307 とは異なる脆弱性です。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Mitigation available
Affected
SPPA-T3000 MS3000 Migration Server: All versions
Fixed
No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
Action
Apply the mitigation in the linked authoritative guidance while planning the vendor's permanent fix.
Workaround
A mitigation or workaround reference is available from the source linked below; validate it against the affected product and version.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 12 Dec 2019 · Last source change 5 Aug 2024, 01:47 UTC · CWE-122 · Heap-based Buffer Overflow

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-09-01
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2019-8081
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. ENISA EUVD mappingEUVD-2019-8081 was added to the official ENISA EUVD mapping for this CVE.
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    {"euvdId":"EUVD-2019-8081"}
    ENISA EUVD ↗
  2. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed: added mitigation: cert-portal.siemens.com/ssa-451445.pdf; added remediation: cert-portal.siemens.com/ssa-451445.pdf.
    Before
    no authoritative guidance recorded
    After
    mitigation: cert-portal.siemens.com/ssa-451445.pdf · remediation: cert-portal.siemens.com/ssa-451445.pdf
    cert-portal.siemens.com ↗
  3. Remediation statusRemediation status changed from Awaiting fix to Mitigation available.
    Before
    Awaiting fix
    After
    Mitigation available
    cert-portal.siemens.com ↗
  4. Public exploit evidencePublic exploit evidence changed from No public exploit to Public exploit reference.
    Before
    No public exploit
    After
    Public exploit reference
    packetstormsecurity.com ↗
  5. SeveritySeverity changed from Unknown to High.
    Before
    Unknown
    After
    High
    NIST NVD ↗
  6. CVSS scoreCVSS score changed from not recorded to 7.5 (CVSS 3.1 · NIST NVD · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    7.5 (CVSS 3.1 · NIST NVD · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H)
    NIST NVD ↗
  7. Catalogue recordCVE added to the BlackTree catalogue.
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2019-18292 · cve.blacktree.nl