BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2019
CVE-2019-16869High confidence

Netty before 4.1.42.Final mishandles whitespace before the colon in HTTP headers (such as a "Transfer-Encoding : chunked" line), which leads to HTTP request smuggling

Unknown · Unknown

7.5HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Critical, raised one band.upgradedsince 7 Jul 2025

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • A structured source references public exploit or proof-of-concept material.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 8.64% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Increase monitoring for the attack path and post-exploitation behaviour described in the report.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Unknown Unknown and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 3 daysRemediation target: Within 90 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

4 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcenettyVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:4.1.33-2Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 23 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcenettyVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:4.1.33-2Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 23 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcenettyVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:4.1.33-2Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 23 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcenettyVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:4.1.33-2Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 23 Oct 2026
Open-source package ranges6 source-attributed ranges

These OSV and GitHub advisory ranges apply only to the named package and ecosystem. A listed fixed version is not a universal product patch or proof that an update is installed.

Ecosystem and packageAffected rangeFirst fixed versionEvidence
Mavenio.netty:nettyECOSYSTEM: introduced 3.3.0.Final; last affected 4.0.0.Alpha8Not statedOSV record ↗aggregator derived · 29 Jun 2026
Mavenio.netty:netty-allECOSYSTEM: introduced 4.0.0.Beta1; fixed 4.1.42.Final4.1.42.FinalOSV record ↗aggregator derived · 29 Jun 2026
Mavenorg.jboss.netty:nettyECOSYSTEM: introduced 0; last affected 3.2.9.FinalNot statedOSV record ↗aggregator derived · 29 Jun 2026
mavenio.netty:netty>= 3.3.0.Final, <= 4.0.0.Alpha8Not statedGitHub advisory ↗github reviewed aggregator · 29 Jun 2026
mavenio.netty:netty-all>= 4.0.0.Beta1, < 4.1.42.Final4.1.42.FinalGitHub advisory ↗github reviewed aggregator · 29 Jun 2026
mavenorg.jboss.netty:netty<= 3.2.9.FinalNot statedGitHub advisory ↗github reviewed aggregator · 29 Jun 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
CVE-2019-16869 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 1 · finalStackable Product Security TeamCVE-2019-16869
4 fixed

The vendor explicitly identifies these products or versions as containing the fix.

  • pkg:maven/io.netty/netty@3.10.6.Final?type=jar@pkg:oci/hive@sha256%3Adac7f4ce599e4b788d477d5073c145658a933cc4fa4b0520d0e74839b553b208?arch=amd64&repository_url=oci.stackable.tech%2Fsdp%2Fhive
  • pkg:maven/io.netty/netty@3.10.6.Final?type=jar@pkg:oci/hive@sha256%3A0deeb02fc02e9e38df96e6aadfd873c029d1da8621d78d48cb273d9f26bf2d55?arch=amd64&repository_url=oci.stackable.tech%2Fsdp%2Fhive
  • pkg:maven/io.netty/netty@3.10.6.Final?type=jar@pkg:oci/hive@sha256%3A476748d810e89695509eaccddee9c7def45f51829e0b712d730649bdfbc51108?arch=arm64&repository_url=oci.stackable.tech%2Fsdp%2Fhive
  • pkg:maven/io.netty/netty@3.10.6.Final?type=jar@pkg:oci/hive@sha256%3A2fa6bd010d5debb13a9da65194c5460e7e1aa5d3f2ab33d4e6e00069cc440f99?arch=arm64&repository_url=oci.stackable.tech%2Fsdp%2Fhive
Summary
Netty before 4.1.42.Final mishandles whitespace before the colon in HTTP headers (such as a "Transfer-Encoding : chunked" line), which leads to HTTP request smuggling.
Remediation
No remediation text is recorded.
CVE-2019-16869 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitynetty: HTTP request smuggling by mishandled whitespace before the colon in HTTP headers
3 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • netty as a component of Red Hat JBoss Fuse 6
  • openshift3/ose-logging-elasticsearch5 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11
  • openshift4/ose-logging-elasticsearch5 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4
Summary
A flaw was found in Netty, where whitespace before the colon in HTTP headers is mishandled. This flaw allows an attacker to cause HTTP request smuggling.
Remediation
Before applying this update, back up your existing Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform installation and deployed applications. For details about how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, see: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2019-0710

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

Netty before 4.1.42.Final mishandles whitespace before the colon in HTTP headers (such as a "Transfer-Encoding : chunked" line), which leads to HTTP request smuggling.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
0.0
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

Netty before 4.1.42.Final mishandles whitespace before the colon in HTTP headers (such as a "Transfer-Encoding : chunked" line), which leads to HTTP request smuggling.

What

Netty before 4.1.42.Final mishandles whitespace before the colon in HTTP headers (such as a "Transfer-Encoding : chunked" line), which leads to HTTP request smuggling.

Why

The product acts as an intermediary HTTP agent (such as a proxy or firewall) in the data flow between two entities such as a client and server, but it does not interpret malformed HTTP requests or responses in ways that are consistent with how the messages will be processed by those entities that are at the ultimate destination.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

Netty before 4.1.42.Final mishandles whitespace before the colon in HTTP headers (such as a "Transfer-Encoding : chunked" line), which leads to HTTP request smuggling.

Why

The product acts as an intermediary HTTP agent (such as a proxy or firewall) in the data flow between two entities such as a client and server, but it does not interpret malformed HTTP requests or responses in ways that are consistent with how the messages will be processed by those entities that are at the ultimate destination.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
Reference recorded

A structured CVE source labels at least one public reference as exploit material. BlackTree has not independently validated that it is safe, reliable or weaponised.

Likely attack path
a network path → Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-444 ↗

CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling'). The product acts as an intermediary HTTP agent (such as a proxy or firewall) in the data flow between two entities such as a client and server, but it does not interpret malformed HTTP requests or responses in ways that are consistent with how the messages will be processed by those entities that are at the ultimate destination.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.ANoneAvailability impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-444Public exploit reference
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2019-0710Official EUVD mapping

Netty before 4.1.42.Final mishandles whitespace before the colon in HTTP headers (such as a "Transfer-Encoding : chunked" line), which leads to HTTP request smuggling.

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1459Dell Data Protection Advisor: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell Data Protection Advisor ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen, und um weitere nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1926Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform auf Red Hat Enterprise Linux ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen, vertrauliche Informationen preiszugeben, Dateien und Daten zu manipulieren oder Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2022-0770IBM DB2: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer oder authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM DB2 ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erhöhen oder einen Denial of Service zu verursachen

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2022-2133JFrog Artifactory: Mehrere Schwachstellen in Drittanbieter-Komponenten

JFrog Artifactory nutzt verschiedene Komponenten von Drittanbietern. Diese enthalten mehrere Schwachstellen. Neuen Informationen von JFrog zufolge sind diese Schwachstellen jedoch nicht in Produkten von JFrog ausnutzbar.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1165Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

rg/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-8009 Référence CVE CVE-2018-8013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-8013 Référence CVE CVE-2018-8023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-8023 Référence CVE CVE-2018-8024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-8024 Référence CVE CVE-2019-0204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-0204 Référence CVE CVE-2019-0231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-0231 Référence CVE CVE-2019-10099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-10099 Référence CVE CVE-2019-11358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-11358 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14893 Référence CVE CVE-2019-16869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-16869 Référence CVE CVE-2019-20444 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20444 Référence CVE CVE-2019-20445 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20445 Référence CVE CVE-2019-8331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-8331 Référence CVE CVE-2020-10683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-10683 Référence CVE CVE-2020-11022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11022 Référence CVE CVE-2020-11023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11023 Référence CVE CVE-2020-11988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11988 Référence CVE CVE-2020-13955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0627Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Splunk

d?id=CVE-2019-10172 Référence CVE CVE-2019-10202 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-10202 Référence CVE CVE-2019-12086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-12086 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14379 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14379 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14439 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14439 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14540 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14540 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14892 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14893 Référence CVE CVE-2019-16335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-16335 Référence CVE CVE-2019-16869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-16869 Référence CVE CVE-2019-16942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-16942 Référence CVE CVE-2019-16943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-16943 Référence CVE CVE-2019-17267 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-17267 Référence CVE CVE-2019-17531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-17531 Référence CVE CVE-2019-20330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20330 Référence CVE CVE-2019-20444 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20444 Référence CVE CVE-2019-20445 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20445 Référence CVE CVE-2020-10650 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0661Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Splunk

Record?id=CVE-2018-3824 Référence CVE CVE-2018-5968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-5968 Référence CVE CVE-2018-7489 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-7489 Référence CVE CVE-2019-10172 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-10172 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14379 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14379 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14439 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14439 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14540 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14540 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14892 Référence CVE CVE-2019-16335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-16335 Référence CVE CVE-2019-16869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-16869 Référence CVE CVE-2019-16943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-16943 Référence CVE CVE-2019-17267 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-17267 Référence CVE CVE-2019-17531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-17531 Référence CVE CVE-2019-20444 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20444 Référence CVE CVE-2019-20445 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20445 Référence CVE CVE-2019-9674 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-9674 Référence CVE CVE-2020-10650 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-10650 Référence CVE CVE-2020-36189 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0106Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

BM 7182424 du 04 février 2025 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7182424 Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7182696 du 05 février 2025 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7182696 Référence CVE CVE-2016-2193 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-2193 Référence CVE CVE-2017-15010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-15010 Référence CVE CVE-2018-20346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-20346 Référence CVE CVE-2018-20505 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-20505 Référence CVE CVE-2018-20506 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-20506 Référence CVE CVE-2019-12900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-12900 Référence CVE CVE-2019-16869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-16869 Référence CVE CVE-2019-20444 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20444 Référence CVE CVE-2019-20445 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20445 Référence CVE CVE-2019-20478 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20478 Référence CVE CVE-2019-9020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-9020 Référence CVE CVE-2019-9021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-9021 Référence CVE CVE-2019-9023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-9023 Référence CVE CVE-2019-9638 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-9638 Référence CVE CVE-2019-9639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0021Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

IBM 7180545 du 08 janvier 2025 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7180545 Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7180450 du 09 janvier 2025 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7180450 Référence CVE CVE-2014-0193 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-0193 Référence CVE CVE-2015-2156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-2156 Référence CVE CVE-2019-10172 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-10172 Référence CVE CVE-2019-10202 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-10202 Référence CVE CVE-2019-10768 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-10768 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14863 Référence CVE CVE-2019-16869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-16869 Référence CVE CVE-2019-20444 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20444 Référence CVE CVE-2019-20445 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20445 Référence CVE CVE-2020-7238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-7238 Référence CVE CVE-2020-7676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-7676 Référence CVE CVE-2021-21290 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21290 Référence CVE CVE-2021-21295 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21295 Référence CVE CVE-2021-32036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-32036 Référence CVE CVE-2021-32040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0031Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

05 janvier 2024 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6830977 Bulletin de sécurité IBM 6830983 du 05 janvier 2024 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6830983 Bulletin de sécurité IBM 6831007 du 05 janvier 2024 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6831007 Bulletin de sécurité IBM 6831013 du 05 janvier 2024 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6831013 Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7062347 du 11 janvier 2024 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7062347 Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7105500 du 06 janvier 2024 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7105500 Référence CVE CVE-2018-17196 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-17196 Référence CVE CVE-2019-16869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-16869 Référence CVE CVE-2019-20444 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20444 Référence CVE CVE-2019-20445 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20445 Référence CVE CVE-2019-9518 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-9518 Référence CVE CVE-2020-11612 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11612 Référence CVE CVE-2020-7238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-7238 Référence CVE CVE-2021-21290 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21290 Référence CVE CVE-2021-21295 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21295 Référence CVE CVE-2021-21409 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-113Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits NetApp

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits NetApp. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une atteinte à l'intégrité des données et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2020-001544Netty における HTTP リクエストスマグリングに関する脆弱性

Netty には、HTTP リクエストスマグリングに関する脆弱性が存在します。 本脆弱性は、CVE-2019-16869 に対する修正が不完全だったことに起因する脆弱性です。

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2019-009743Netty における HTTP リクエストスマグリングに関する脆弱性

Netty には、HTTP リクエストスマグリングに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
n/a
Fixed
Action
Follow Stackable Product Security Team's fixed-release guidance in the linked advisory.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 26 Sept 2019 · Last source change 8 Oct 2026, 21:14 UTC · CWE-444 · Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-09-01
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2019-0710
Product sourceUnavailable
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Stackable Product Security Team
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    n/a · Fixed: An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
    After
    n/a · Fixed: Before applying this update, back up your existing Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform installation and deployed applications. For details about how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, see: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
  2. ENISA EUVD mappingEUVD-2019-0710 was added to the official ENISA EUVD mapping for this CVE.
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    {"euvdId":"EUVD-2019-0710"}
    ENISA EUVD ↗
  3. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed: added patch: github.com/9571; added patch: github.com/netty-4.1.41.Final...netty-4.1.42.Final; removed vendor advisory: access.redhat.com/RHSA-2019:3892; removed vendor advisory: access.redhat.com/RHSA-2019:3901; 1 further additions; 7 further removals.
    Before
    vendor advisory: access.redhat.com/RHSA-2019:3892 · vendor advisory: access.redhat.com/RHSA-2019:3901 · vendor advisory: access.redhat.com/RHSA-2020:0159 · 6 more references
    After
    patch: github.com/9571 · patch: github.com/netty-4.1.41.Final...netty-4.1.42.Final · remediation: github.com/9571
    github.com ↗
  4. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    n/a · Fixed: No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
    After
    n/a · Fixed: An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
    CNA ↗
  5. Remediation statusRemediation status changed from Awaiting fix to Patch available.
    Before
    Awaiting fix
    After
    Patch available
    github.com ↗
  6. Public exploit evidencePublic exploit evidence changed from No public exploit to Public exploit reference.
    Before
    No public exploit
    After
    Public exploit reference
    github.com ↗
  7. SeveritySeverity changed from Unknown to High.
    Before
    Unknown
    After
    High
    NIST NVD ↗
  8. CVSS scoreCVSS score changed from not recorded to 7.5 (CVSS 3.1 · NIST NVD · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N).
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    7.5 (CVSS 3.1 · NIST NVD · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N)
    NIST NVD ↗
  9. Catalogue recordCVE added to the BlackTree catalogue.
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2019-16869 · cve.blacktree.nl