BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2019
CVE-2019-15030High confidence

In the Linux kernel through 5.2.14 on the powerpc platform, a local user can read vector registers of other users' processes via a Facility Unavailable exception

Unknown · Unknown

4.4MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Medium, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • A structured source references public exploit or proof-of-concept material.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.45% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Increase monitoring for the attack path and post-exploitation behaviour described in the report.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Unknown Unknown and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

5 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 1 affected package state shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.2.17-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 23 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.2.17-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 23 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.2.17-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 23 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.2.17-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 23 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 23 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2019-15030 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 46 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2019-15030
137 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SUSE CaaS Platform 4.0
  • kernel-default-base as component of SUSE CaaS Platform 4.0
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE CaaS Platform 4.0
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE CaaS Platform 4.0
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE CaaS Platform 4.0
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE CaaS Platform 4.0
  • reiserfs-kmp-default as component of SUSE CaaS Platform 4.0
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Enterprise Storage 6
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Enterprise Storage 6
  • kernel-source-azure as component of SUSE Enterprise Storage 6
  • kernel-source-azure as component of SUSE Enterprise Storage 7
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
Summary
In the Linux kernel through 5.2.14 on the powerpc platform, a local user can read vector registers of other users' processes via a Facility Unavailable exception. To exploit the venerability, a local user starts a transaction (via the hardware transactional memory instruction tbegin) and then accesses vector registers. At some point, the vector registers will be corrupted with the values from a different local Linux process because of a missing arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c check.
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2019-6117

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel through 5.2.14 on the powerpc platform, a local user can read vector registers of other users' processes via a Facility Unavailable exception. To exploit the venerability, a local user starts a transaction (via the hardware transactional memory instruction tbegin) and then accesses vector registers. At some point, the vector registers will be corrupted with the values from a different local Linux process because of a missing arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c check.

What

In the Linux kernel through 5.2.14 on the powerpc platform, a local user can read vector registers of other users' processes via a Facility Unavailable exception. To exploit the venerability, a local user starts a transaction (via the hardware transactional memory instruction tbegin) and then accesses vector registers. At some point, the vector registers will be corrupted with the values from a different local Linux process because of a missing arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c check.

Why

The application reaches a protected operation without first confirming that the requester is authorised.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel through 5.2.14 on the powerpc platform, a local user can read vector registers of other users' processes via a Facility Unavailable exception. To exploit the venerability, a local user starts a transaction (via the hardware transactional memory instruction tbegin) and then accesses vector registers. At some point, the vector registers will be corrupted with the values from a different local Linux process because of a missing arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c check.

Why

The application reaches a protected operation without first confirming that the requester is authorised.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
Reference recorded

A structured CVE source labels at least one public reference as exploit material. BlackTree has not independently validated that it is safe, reliable or weaponised.

Likely attack path
local access → Missing Authorization → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-862 ↗

CWE-862: Missing Authorization. The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CLowConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.ALowAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-862Public exploit reference
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2020-AVI-147Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, un déni de service à distance et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2020-AVI-029Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

ecord?id=CVE-2018-12207 Référence CVE CVE-2019-0154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-0154 Référence CVE CVE-2019-0155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-0155 Référence CVE CVE-2019-10220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-10220 Référence CVE CVE-2019-11135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-11135 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14821 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14835 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14895 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14895 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14901 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15030 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15031 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15213 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15213 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15916 Référence CVE CVE-2019-16231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-16231 Référence CVE CVE-2019-16232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-16232 Référence CVE CVE-2019-16233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-16233 Référence CVE CVE-2019-16234 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-16234 Référence CVE CVE-2019-16746 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2019-AVI-612Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

019/suse-su-20193200-1/ Référence CVE CVE-2017-18595 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-18595 Référence CVE CVE-2019-0154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-0154 Référence CVE CVE-2019-0155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-0155 Référence CVE CVE-2019-10220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-10220 Référence CVE CVE-2019-11135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-11135 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14821 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14835 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14895 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14895 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15030 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15031 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15916 Référence CVE CVE-2019-16231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-16231 Référence CVE CVE-2019-16233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-16233 Référence CVE CVE-2019-16995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-16995 Référence CVE CVE-2019-17055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-17055 Référence CVE CVE-2019-17056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-17056 Référence CVE CVE-2019-17666 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2019-AVI-530Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2018-20976 Référence CVE CVE-2018-21008 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-21008 Référence CVE CVE-2019-10207 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-10207 Référence CVE CVE-2019-11479 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-11479 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14814 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14815 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14816 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14821 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14835 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15030 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15031 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15090 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15098 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15099 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15117 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15118 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15211 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15212 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2019-AVI-503Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2018-20976 Référence CVE CVE-2018-21008 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-21008 Référence CVE CVE-2019-10207 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-10207 Référence CVE CVE-2019-11477 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-11477 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14814 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14815 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14816 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14821 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14835 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15030 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15031 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15090 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15098 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15099 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15117 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15118 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15211 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15212 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2019-AVI-502Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2017-18595 Référence CVE CVE-2018-20976 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-20976 Référence CVE CVE-2018-21008 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-21008 Référence CVE CVE-2019-10207 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-10207 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14814 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14815 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14816 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14821 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14835 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15030 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15031 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15090 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15098 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15117 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15118 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15211 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15212 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15212 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2019-AVI-455Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

suse-su-20192424-1/ Référence CVE CVE-2017-18551 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-18551 Référence CVE CVE-2018-20976 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-20976 Référence CVE CVE-2018-21008 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-21008 Référence CVE CVE-2019-10207 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-10207 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14814 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14815 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14816 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14835 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15030 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15031 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15090 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15098 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15099 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15117 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15118 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15211 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15212 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2019-AVI-448Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, un déni de service à distance et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2019-009320Linux Kernel における認証の欠如に関する脆弱性

Linux Kernel には、認証の欠如に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 13 Sept 2019 · Last source change 5 Aug 2024, 00:34 UTC · CWE-862 · Missing Authorization

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-09-01
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2019-6117
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. ENISA EUVD mappingEUVD-2019-6117 was added to the official ENISA EUVD mapping for this CVE.
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    {"euvdId":"EUVD-2019-6117"}
    ENISA EUVD ↗
  2. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed: added patch: git.kernel.org/commit?id=8205d5d98ef7f155de211f5e2eb6ca03d95a5a60; added patch: openwall.com/3; removed vendor advisory: access.redhat.com/RHSA-2020:0740; removed vendor advisory: lists.opensuse.org/msg00064.html; 1 further additions; 3 further removals.
    Before
    vendor advisory: access.redhat.com/RHSA-2020:0740 · vendor advisory: lists.opensuse.org/msg00064.html · vendor advisory: lists.opensuse.org/msg00066.html · 2 more references
    After
    patch: git.kernel.org/commit?id=8205d5d98ef7f155de211f5e2eb6ca03d95a5a60 · patch: openwall.com/3 · remediation: git.kernel.org/commit?id=8205d5d98ef7f155de211f5e2eb6ca03d95a5a60
    git.kernel.org ↗
  3. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    n/a · Fixed: No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
    After
    n/a · Fixed: An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
    CNA ↗
  4. Remediation statusRemediation status changed from Awaiting fix to Patch available.
    Before
    Awaiting fix
    After
    Patch available
    git.kernel.org ↗
  5. Public exploit evidencePublic exploit evidence changed from No public exploit to Public exploit reference.
    Before
    No public exploit
    After
    Public exploit reference
    git.kernel.org ↗
  6. SeveritySeverity changed from Unknown to Medium.
    Before
    Unknown
    After
    Medium
    NIST NVD ↗
  7. CVSS scoreCVSS score changed from not recorded to 4.4 (CVSS 3.1 · NIST NVD · CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L).
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    4.4 (CVSS 3.1 · NIST NVD · CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L)
    NIST NVD ↗
  8. Catalogue recordCVE added to the BlackTree catalogue.
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2019-15030 · cve.blacktree.nl