BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2019
CVE-2019-13136High confidence

ImageMagick before 7.0.8-50 has an integer overflow vulnerability in the function TIFFSeekCustomStream in coders/tiff.c

Unknown · Unknown

7.8HighCVSS 3.0
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • A structured source references public exploit or proof-of-concept material.
  • EPSS is 1.46% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Increase monitoring for the attack path and post-exploitation behaviour described in the report.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Unknown Unknown and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Alpine, Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

7 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Alpine v3.23v3.23 · communityimagemagickVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.7.0.8.53-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 22 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.22v3.22 · communityimagemagickVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.7.0.8.53-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 22 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.21v3.21 · communityimagemagickVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.7.0.8.53-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 22 Oct 2026
Debian trixietrixie · sourceimagemagickNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 23 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourceimagemagickNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 23 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourceimagemagickNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 23 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourceimagemagickNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 23 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2019-13136 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 20 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2019-13136
55 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • ImageMagick as component of SUSE CaaS Platform 4.0
  • ImageMagick-config-7-SUSE as component of SUSE CaaS Platform 4.0
  • ImageMagick-config-7-upstream as component of SUSE CaaS Platform 4.0
  • ImageMagick-devel as component of SUSE CaaS Platform 4.0
  • libMagick++-7_Q16HDRI4 as component of SUSE CaaS Platform 4.0
  • libMagick++-devel as component of SUSE CaaS Platform 4.0
  • libMagickCore-7_Q16HDRI6 as component of SUSE CaaS Platform 4.0
  • libMagickWand-7_Q16HDRI6 as component of SUSE CaaS Platform 4.0
  • perl-PerlMagick as component of SUSE CaaS Platform 4.0
  • ImageMagick as component of SUSE Enterprise Storage 6
  • ImageMagick as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1-LTSS
  • ImageMagick-config-7-SUSE as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1-LTSS
Summary
ImageMagick before 7.0.8-50 has an integer overflow vulnerability in the function TIFFSeekCustomStream in coders/tiff.c.
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2019-4670

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

ImageMagick before 7.0.8-50 has an integer overflow vulnerability in the function TIFFSeekCustomStream in coders/tiff.c.

What

ImageMagick before 7.0.8-50 has an integer overflow vulnerability in the function TIFFSeekCustomStream in coders/tiff.c.

Why

The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

ImageMagick before 7.0.8-50 has an integer overflow vulnerability in the function TIFFSeekCustomStream in coders/tiff.c.

Why

The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
Reference recorded

A structured CVE source labels at least one public reference as exploit material. BlackTree has not independently validated that it is safe, reliable or weaponised.

Likely attack path
local access → Integer Overflow or Wraparound → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
Required interaction required
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-190 ↗

CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound. The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.0: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UIRequiredUser interaction: Another user must perform an action for exploitation to succeed.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
UnauthenticatedCWE-190Public exploit reference
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2023-2137ImageMagick: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in ImageMagick ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder Auswirkungen auf die Vertraulichkeit, Verfügbarkeit und Integrität auszuüben.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0969Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

ord?id=CVE-2018-16645 Référence CVE CVE-2018-18384 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-18384 Référence CVE CVE-2018-19876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-19876 Référence CVE CVE-2018-25032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-25032 Référence CVE CVE-2018-3779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-3779 Référence CVE CVE-2018-9133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-9133 Référence CVE CVE-2018-9135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-9135 Référence CVE CVE-2019-1010238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-1010238 Référence CVE CVE-2019-12900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-12900 Référence CVE CVE-2019-13136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-13136 Référence CVE CVE-2019-13147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-13147 Référence CVE CVE-2019-13232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-13232 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14844 Référence CVE CVE-2019-16775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-16775 Référence CVE CVE-2019-16776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-16776 Référence CVE CVE-2019-16777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-16777 Référence CVE CVE-2019-17547 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-17547 Référence CVE CVE-2019-18276 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2020-AVI-331Multiples vulnérabilités dans Google Android

ifs (cf. section Documentation). Documentation Bulletin de sécurité Android du 01 juin 2020 https://source.android.com/security/bulletin/2020-06-01 Bulletin de sécurité Pixel du 01 juin 2020 https://source.android.com/security/bulletin/pixel/2020-06-01 Référence CVE CVE-2017-9704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-9704 Référence CVE CVE-2019-10501 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-10501 Référence CVE CVE-2019-10597 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-10597 Référence CVE CVE-2019-10626 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-10626 Référence CVE CVE-2019-13135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-13135 Référence CVE CVE-2019-13136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-13136 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14047 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14062 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14073 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14076 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14080 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14091 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14092 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2019-005894ImageMagick における整数オーバーフローの脆弱性

ImageMagick には、整数オーバーフローの脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
Fixed
An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
Action
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 1 Jul 2019 · Last source change 4 Aug 2024, 23:41 UTC · CWE-190 · Integer Overflow or Wraparound

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-09-01
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2019-4670
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. ENISA EUVD mappingEUVD-2019-4670 was added to the official ENISA EUVD mapping for this CVE.
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    {"euvdId":"EUVD-2019-4670"}
    ENISA EUVD ↗
  2. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed: added patch: github.com/fe5f4b85e6b1b54d3b4588a77133c06ade46d891; added remediation: github.com/fe5f4b85e6b1b54d3b4588a77133c06ade46d891; removed vendor advisory: lists.opensuse.org/msg00069.html.
    Before
    vendor advisory: lists.opensuse.org/msg00069.html
    After
    patch: github.com/fe5f4b85e6b1b54d3b4588a77133c06ade46d891 · remediation: github.com/fe5f4b85e6b1b54d3b4588a77133c06ade46d891
    github.com ↗
  3. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    n/a · Fixed: No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
    After
    n/a · Fixed: An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
    CNA ↗
  4. Remediation statusRemediation status changed from Awaiting fix to Patch available.
    Before
    Awaiting fix
    After
    Patch available
    github.com ↗
  5. Public exploit evidencePublic exploit evidence changed from No public exploit to Public exploit reference.
    Before
    No public exploit
    After
    Public exploit reference
    github.com ↗
  6. SeveritySeverity changed from Unknown to High.
    Before
    Unknown
    After
    High
    NIST NVD ↗
  7. CVSS scoreCVSS score changed from not recorded to 7.8 (CVSS 3.0 · NIST NVD · CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    7.8 (CVSS 3.0 · NIST NVD · CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H)
    NIST NVD ↗
  8. Catalogue recordCVE added to the BlackTree catalogue.
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Fixed release or patch reference recorded
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2019-4670↗Vendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team↗Patch or update reference↗Public exploit reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2019-13136 · cve.blacktree.nl