BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2019
CVE-2019-1233High confidence

Microsoft Microsoft Exchange Server 2016: security vulnerability

Microsoft · Microsoft Exchange Server 2016

7.5HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 6.18% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Microsoft Microsoft Exchange Server 2016 and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2019-9800

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

A denial of service vulnerability exists in Microsoft Exchange Server software when the software fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Microsoft Exchange Denial of Service Vulnerability'.

What

A denial of service vulnerability exists in Microsoft Exchange Server software when the software fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Microsoft Exchange Denial of Service Vulnerability'.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

A denial of service vulnerability exists in Microsoft Exchange Server software when the software fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Microsoft Exchange Denial of Service Vulnerability'.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → vulnerable operation → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedDenial of service
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2019-AVI-570Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Microsoft

un déni de service. Solution Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation). Documentation Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft du 12 novembre 2019 https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/fr-FR/security-guidance Référence CVE CVE-2019-1138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-1138 Référence CVE CVE-2019-1209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-1209 Référence CVE CVE-2019-1217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-1217 Référence CVE CVE-2019-1231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-1231 Référence CVE CVE-2019-1232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-1232 Référence CVE CVE-2019-1233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-1233 Référence CVE CVE-2019-1234 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-1234 Référence CVE CVE-2019-1237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-1237 Référence CVE CVE-2019-1255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-1255 Référence CVE CVE-2019-1265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-1265 Référence CVE CVE-2019-1266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-1266 Référence CVE CVE-2019-1298 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-1298 Référence CVE CVE-2019-1300 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-1300 Référence CVE CVE-2019-1301 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-1301 Ré

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2019-AVI-438Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Microsoft

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été corrigées dans les produits Microsoft . Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un contournement de la fonctionnalité de sécurité, une atteinte à la confidentialité des données, une élévation de privilèges, une exécution de code à distance et un déni de service.

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2019-009377Microsoft Exchange Server におけるサービス運用妨害 (DoS) の脆弱性

Microsoft Exchange Server には、メモリ内のオブジェクトの適切な処理に失敗した場合、サービス運用妨害 (DoS) の脆弱性が存在します。 ベンダは、本脆弱性を「Microsoft Exchange のサービス拒否の脆弱性」として公開しています。

Official advisory ↗
KISA KrCERT/CC · Korean · KNVD-5058MS 9월 보안 위협에 따른 정기 보안 업데이트 권고

경우, 원격코드실행을 허용하는 취약점 o 관련취약점 : - 원격코드실행 취약점(CVE-2019-1257,CVE-2019-1296) - 권한상승 취약점(CVE-2019-1260) - DID 취약점(CVE-2019-1259,CVE-2019-1261,CVE-2019-1262) o 영향 : 원격코드실행 o 중요도 : 긴급 o 관련 KB번호 - 4484098, 4475590, 4475605, 4475596, 4484098, 4484099, 4475590, 4475594, 4475596, 4464557 ##### □ 해결책 o 영향 받는 소프트웨어를 이용하는 경우 마이크로소프트사의 보안 패치 적용 12. Lync 보안 업데이트 ##### □ 설명 o 공격자가 프로그램의 미흡한 설계(적절한 검증 부재)를 악용하여 제한된 자원에 접근가능한 정보노출 취약점 o 관련취약점 : - 정보노출 취약점(CVE-2019-1209) o 영향 : 정보노출 o 중요도 : 중요 o 관련 KB번호 - 4515509 ##### □ 해결책 o 영향 받는 소프트웨어를 이용하는 경우 마이크로소프트사의 보안 패치 적용 13. Exchange Server 보안 업데이트 ##### □ 설명 o 공격자가 시스템의 자원을 고갈시켜 발생하는 서비스거부 취약점 o 관련취약점 : - 서비스거부 취약점(CVE-2019-1233) - DID 취약점(CVE-2019-1266) o 영향 : 서비스거부 o 중요도 : 중요 o 관련 KB번호 - 4515832 ##### □ 해결책 o 영향 받는 소프트웨어를 이용하는 경우 마이크로소프트사의 보안 패치 적용 14. .NET Core 보안 업데이트 ##### □ 설명 o 공격자가 프로그램 버그(실행 처리 구문의 허점 등)을 악용하여 보호되는 자원들에 임의로 접근하는 권한상승 취약점 o 관련취약점 : - 권한상승 취약점(CVE-2019-1142) o 영향 : 권한상승 o 중요도 : 중요 o 관련 KB번호 - 4514604, 4514599, 4514603, 4514598, 4516044, 4516070, 4516068, 4516066, 4516058, 4514354, 4514355, 4514356, 4514357, 4514601, 4514359 ##### □ 해결책 o 영향 받는 소프트웨어를 이용하는 경우 마이크로소프트사의 보안 패치 적용 15. Adobe Flash Player 보안 업데이트 ##### □ 설명 o 지원되는 모든 버전의 Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2012 R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 및 Windows Server 2016에 설치된

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
Fixed
An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 11 Sept 2019 · Last source change 4 Aug 2024, 18:13 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-09-01
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2019-9800
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. ENISA EUVD mappingEUVD-2019-9800 was added to the official ENISA EUVD mapping for this CVE.
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    {"euvdId":"EUVD-2019-9800"}
    ENISA EUVD ↗
  2. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed: added patch: portal.msrc.microsoft.com/CVE-2019-1233; added remediation: portal.msrc.microsoft.com/CVE-2019-1233.
    Before
    no authoritative guidance recorded
    After
    patch: portal.msrc.microsoft.com/CVE-2019-1233 · remediation: portal.msrc.microsoft.com/CVE-2019-1233
    portal.msrc.microsoft.com ↗
  3. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    Cumulative Update 12; Cumulative Update 13; Cumulative Update 1; Cumulative Update 2 · Fixed: No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
    After
    Cumulative Update 12; Cumulative Update 13; Cumulative Update 1; Cumulative Update 2 · Fixed: An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
    CNA ↗
  4. Remediation statusRemediation status changed from Awaiting fix to Patch available.
    Before
    Awaiting fix
    After
    Patch available
    portal.msrc.microsoft.com ↗
  5. SeveritySeverity changed from Unknown to High.
    Before
    Unknown
    After
    High
    NIST NVD ↗
  6. CVSS scoreCVSS score changed from not recorded to 7.5 (CVSS 3.1 · NIST NVD · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    7.5 (CVSS 3.1 · NIST NVD · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H)
    NIST NVD ↗
  7. Catalogue recordCVE added to the BlackTree catalogue.
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2019-1233 · cve.blacktree.nl