BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2018
CVE-2018-9251High confidence

Affected product: Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop')

Unknown · Unknown

5.3MediumCVSS 3.0
Recommended action
Within 7 days

Medium technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Fix not verified
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:High, raised one band.upgradedsince 5 Aug 2024

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • A structured source references public exploit or proof-of-concept material.
  • EPSS is 2.36% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Increase monitoring for the attack path and post-exploitation behaviour described in the report.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Unknown Unknown and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Recheck the vendor advisory before scheduling a change because no verified fixed version is currently retained.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Alpine, Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

7 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Alpine v3.23v3.23 · mainlibxml2Vendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.2.9.8-r1Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.22v3.22 · mainlibxml2Vendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.2.9.8-r1Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.21v3.21 · mainlibxml2Vendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.2.9.8-r1Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelibxml2Not affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelibxml2Not affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelibxml2Not affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelibxml2Not affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2018-20845

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

Medium technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Fix not verified
01

What, why and how

The xz_decomp function in xzlib.c in libxml2 2.9.8, if --with-lzma is used, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via a crafted XML file that triggers LZMA_MEMLIMIT_ERROR, as demonstrated by xmllint, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-8035.

What

The xz_decomp function in xzlib.c in libxml2 2.9.8, if --with-lzma is used, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via a crafted XML file that triggers LZMA_MEMLIMIT_ERROR, as demonstrated by xmllint, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-8035.

Why

A malformed condition prevents a loop from making progress or terminating, allowing resource exhaustion.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

The xz_decomp function in xzlib.c in libxml2 2.9.8, if --with-lzma is used, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via a crafted XML file that triggers LZMA_MEMLIMIT_ERROR, as demonstrated by xmllint, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-8035.

Why

A malformed condition prevents a loop from making progress or terminating, allowing resource exhaustion.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
Reference recorded

A structured CVE source labels at least one public reference as exploit material. BlackTree has not independently validated that it is safe, reliable or weaponised.

Likely attack path
a network path → Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
Required interaction required
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-835 ↗

CWE-835: Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop'). The product contains an iteration or loop with an exit condition that cannot be reached, i.e., an infinite loop.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.0: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UIRequiredUser interaction: Another user must perform an action for exploitation to succeed.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedDenial of serviceCWE-835Public exploit reference
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2023-1614Tenable Security Nessus Network Monitor: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer, authentisierter oder lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Tenable Security Nessus Network Monitor ausnutzen, um beliebigen Code auszuführen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand auszulösen und Daten zu manipulieren.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2023-AVI-0499Multiples vulnérabilités dans Tenable Nessus Network Monitor

.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-7375 Référence CVE CVE-2017-7376 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-7376 Référence CVE CVE-2017-8872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-8872 Référence CVE CVE-2017-9047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-9047 Référence CVE CVE-2017-9048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-9048 Référence CVE CVE-2017-9049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-9049 Référence CVE CVE-2017-9050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-9050 Référence CVE CVE-2018-14404 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-14404 Référence CVE CVE-2018-14567 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-14567 Référence CVE CVE-2018-9251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-9251 Référence CVE CVE-2019-11068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-11068 Référence CVE CVE-2019-12900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-12900 Référence CVE CVE-2019-13117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-13117 Référence CVE CVE-2019-13118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-13118 Référence CVE CVE-2019-16168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-16168 Référence CVE CVE-2019-19242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-19242 Référence CVE CVE-2019-19244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-19244 Référence CVE CVE-2019-19317 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=C

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-650Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Juniper

ERecord?id=CVE-2018-14719 Référence CVE CVE-2018-14720 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-14720 Référence CVE CVE-2018-14721 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-14721 Référence CVE CVE-2018-19360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-19360 Référence CVE CVE-2018-19361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-19361 Référence CVE CVE-2018-19362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-19362 Référence CVE CVE-2018-6954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-6954 Référence CVE CVE-2018-7489 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-7489 Référence CVE CVE-2018-8088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-8088 Référence CVE CVE-2018-9251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-9251 Référence CVE CVE-2019-0205 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-0205 Référence CVE CVE-2019-1349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-1349 Référence CVE CVE-2019-1350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-1350 Référence CVE CVE-2019-1352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-1352 Référence CVE CVE-2019-1354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-1354 Référence CVE CVE-2019-1387 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-1387 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14379 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14379 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14540 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-1454

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2019-AVI-014Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Juniper

.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-3693 Référence CVE CVE-2018-5390 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-5390 Référence CVE CVE-2018-5391 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-5391 Référence CVE CVE-2018-5683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-5683 Référence CVE CVE-2018-5740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-5740 Référence CVE CVE-2018-5748 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-5748 Référence CVE CVE-2018-7566 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-7566 Référence CVE CVE-2018-7858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-7858 Référence CVE CVE-2018-8897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-8897 Référence CVE CVE-2018-9251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-9251 Référence CVE CVE-2019-0001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-0001 Référence CVE CVE-2019-0002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-0002 Référence CVE CVE-2019-0003 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-0003 Référence CVE CVE-2019-0004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-0004 Référence CVE CVE-2019-0005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-0005 Référence CVE CVE-2019-0006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-0006 Référence CVE CVE-2019-0007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-0007 Référence CVE CVE-2019-0009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-0009 Ré

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2018-AVI-293Multiples vulnérabilités dans Tenable Nessus Agent

ve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-8872 Référence CVE CVE-2017-9047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-9047 Référence CVE CVE-2017-9048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-9048 Référence CVE CVE-2017-9049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-9049 Référence CVE CVE-2017-9050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-9050 Référence CVE CVE-2017-9233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-9233 Référence CVE CVE-2018-0733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-0733 Référence CVE CVE-2018-0739 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-0739 Référence CVE CVE-2018-11214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-11214 Référence CVE CVE-2018-9251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-9251 Gestion détaillée du document le 15 juin 2018 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gouv.fr france.fr info.gouv.fr/risques Premier Ministre / Secrétariat Général de la Défense et de la Sécurité Nationale / Agence nationale de la sécurité des systèmes d'information

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2018-AVI-288Multiples vulnérabilités dans Tenable Nessus

ve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-7246 Référence CVE CVE-2017-7375 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-7375 Référence CVE CVE-2017-8872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-8872 Référence CVE CVE-2017-9047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-9047 Référence CVE CVE-2017-9048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-9048 Référence CVE CVE-2017-9049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-9049 Référence CVE CVE-2017-9050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-9050 Référence CVE CVE-2017-9233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-9233 Référence CVE CVE-2018-11214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-11214 Référence CVE CVE-2018-9251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-9251 Gestion détaillée du document le 14 juin 2018 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gouv.fr france.fr info.gouv.fr/risques Premier Ministre / Secrétariat Général de la Défense et de la Sécurité Nationale / Agence nationale de la sécurité des systèmes d'information

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2018-009112libxml2 におけるリソースの枯渇に関する脆弱性

libxml2 には、リソースの枯渇に関する脆弱性が存在します。 本脆弱性は、CVE-2015-8035 および CVE-2018-9251 とは異なる脆弱性です。

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2018-003914libxml2 におけるリソースの枯渇に関する脆弱性

libxml2 には、リソースの枯渇に関する脆弱性が存在します。 本脆弱性は、CVE-2015-8035 とは異なる脆弱性です。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix not verified
Affected
n/a
Fixed
No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
Action
No verified patch reference is present in the current structured sources. Check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 4 Apr 2018 · Last source change 5 Aug 2024, 07:17 UTC · CWE-835 · Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-09-01
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2018-20845
Product sourceUnavailable
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. ENISA EUVD mappingEUVD-2018-20845 was added to the official ENISA EUVD mapping for this CVE.
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    {"euvdId":"EUVD-2018-20845"}
    ENISA EUVD ↗
  2. Public exploit evidencePublic exploit evidence changed from No public exploit to Public exploit reference.
    Before
    No public exploit
    After
    Public exploit reference
    bugzilla.gnome.org ↗
  3. SeveritySeverity changed from Unknown to Medium.
    Before
    Unknown
    After
    Medium
    NIST NVD ↗
  4. CVSS scoreCVSS score changed from not recorded to 5.3 (CVSS 3.0 · NIST NVD · CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    5.3 (CVSS 3.0 · NIST NVD · CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H)
    NIST NVD ↗
  5. Catalogue recordCVE added to the BlackTree catalogue.
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2018-9251 · cve.blacktree.nl