Evidence used
- No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
- A structured source references public exploit or proof-of-concept material.
- EPSS is 4.58% for the current model date.
BlackTreeCVE IntelligenceUnknown · Unknown
Critical technical impact and a public exploit reference; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.
A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.
| Distribution release | Source package | Vendor state | Fixed version | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debian trixietrixie · source | openocd | Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release. | 0.10.0-4 | Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026 |
| Debian bookwormbookworm · source | openocd | Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release. | 0.10.0-4 | Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026 |
| Debian forkyforky · source | openocd | Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release. | 0.10.0-4 | Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026 |
| Debian sidsid · source | openocd | Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release. | 0.10.0-4 | Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026 |
Critical technical impact and a public exploit reference; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
Patch availableOpen On-Chip Debugger (OpenOCD) 0.10.0 does not block attempts to use HTTP POST for sending data to 127.0.0.1 port 4444, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-protocol scripting attacks, and consequently execute arbitrary commands, via a crafted web site.
Open On-Chip Debugger (OpenOCD) 0.10.0 does not block attempts to use HTTP POST for sending data to 127.0.0.1 port 4444, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-protocol scripting attacks, and consequently execute arbitrary commands, via a crafted web site.
The product uses a function that accepts a format string as an argument, but the format string originates from an external source.
An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.
Open On-Chip Debugger (OpenOCD) 0.10.0 does not block attempts to use HTTP POST for sending data to 127.0.0.1 port 4444, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-protocol scripting attacks, and consequently execute arbitrary commands, via a crafted web site.
The product uses a function that accepts a format string as an argument, but the format string originates from an external source.
An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.
CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.
No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.
A structured CVE source labels at least one public reference as exploit material. BlackTree has not independently validated that it is safe, reliable or weaponised.
CWE-134: Use of Externally-Controlled Format String. The product uses a function that accepts a format string as an argument, but the format string originates from an external source.
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:HCommon Vulnerability Scoring System 3.0: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.
Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.
Published 16 Jan 2018 · Last source change 5 Aug 2024, 05:40 UTC · CWE-134 · Use of Externally-Controlled Format String
Missing structured fields: affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.