High technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.
Published severityHigh→Operational priority:Critical, raised one band.upgradedsince 5 Aug 2024
Evidence used
No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
A structured source references public exploit or proof-of-concept material.
The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
EPSS is 10.31% for the current model date.
Compensating controls
Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
Increase monitoring for the attack path and post-exploitation behaviour described in the report.
Verification
Confirm that the asset runs Unknown Unknown and falls inside the recorded affected range.
Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Distribution package intelligence
Release-specific package status
Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.
8 package states
Repository candidate not checked
A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.
Distribution release
Source package
Vendor state
Fixed version
Evidence
Debian trixietrixie · source
chromium
Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.
Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.
The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.
B&R Industrial Automation GmbH Automation Studio <6.5
Summary
SQLite before 3.25.3, when the FTS3 extension is enabled, encounters an integer overflow (and resultant buffer overflow) for FTS3 queries that occur after crafted changes to FTS3 shadow tables, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by leveraging the ability to run arbitrary SQL statements (such as in certain WebSQL use cases), aka Magellan.
Remediation
The problem is corrected in the following product versions: B&R Automation Studio 6.5 B&R recommends that customers apply the update at earliest convenience. The process to install updates is described in the user manual. The step to identify the installed product version is described in the user manual.
The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.
ABB Ability Camera Connect <=2.0.0.42
Summary
SQLite before 3.25.3, when the FTS3 extension is enabled, encounters an integer overflow (and resultant buffer over-flow) for FTS3 queries that occur after crafted changes to FTS3 shadow tables, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by leveraging the ability to run arbitrary SQL statements (such as in certain WebSQL use cases), aka Magellan.
Remediation
The problem is corrected in the following product versions: - ABB Ability Camera Connect 2.0.0.49. The easiest path to mitigate the problem is an update of ABB Ability Camera Connect system by the customer. ABB recommends that customers apply the update at earliest convenience.
Optional official sources
National CERT insights ?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.
Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.
Official European source
ENISA European Vulnerability Database
Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.
1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier
EUVD-2018-12904
No EUVD known-exploited evidence
ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.
EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days
High technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.
Patch available
01
What, why and how
SQLite before 3.25.3, when the FTS3 extension is enabled, encounters an integer overflow (and resultant buffer overflow) for FTS3 queries that occur after crafted changes to FTS3 shadow tables, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by leveraging the ability to run arbitrary SQL statements (such as in certain WebSQL use cases), aka Magellan.
What
SQLite before 3.25.3, when the FTS3 extension is enabled, encounters an integer overflow (and resultant buffer overflow) for FTS3 queries that occur after crafted changes to FTS3 shadow tables, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by leveraging the ability to run arbitrary SQL statements (such as in certain WebSQL use cases), aka Magellan.
Why
The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.
How
An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.
What
SQLite before 3.25.3, when the FTS3 extension is enabled, encounters an integer overflow (and resultant buffer overflow) for FTS3 queries that occur after crafted changes to FTS3 shadow tables, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by leveraging the ability to run arbitrary SQL statements (such as in certain WebSQL use cases), aka Magellan.
Why
The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.
How
An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.
02
Exploit reality and attack path
CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.
Observed exploitation ?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.No confirmed evidence
No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.
Public PoC / exploit material ?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.Reference recorded
A structured CVE source labels at least one public reference as exploit material. BlackTree has not independently validated that it is safe, reliable or weaponised.
Likely attack path
a network path → Integer Overflow or Wraparound → execute code or commands in the affected security context
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness ?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound. The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.
CVSS vector ?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.0: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.
AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
After compromise, an attacker may use built-in shells, scripting engines, scheduled tasks and native network utilities for discovery, persistence or movement. This is a plausible LoTL path, not evidence that it has occurred for every attack.
SQLite before 3.25.3, when the FTS3 extension is enabled, encounters an integer overflow (and resultant buffer overflow) for FTS3 queries that occur after crafted changes to FTS3 shadow tables, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by leveraging the ability to run arbitrary SQL statements (such as in certain WebSQL use cases), aka Magellan.
Official advisory ↗CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0106Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM
sécurité IBM 7181898 du 02 février 2025
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7181898
Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7182335 du 03 février 2025
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7182335
Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7181480 du 04 février 2025
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7181480
Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7182424 du 04 février 2025
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7182424
Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7182696 du 05 février 2025
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7182696
Référence CVE CVE-2016-2193
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-2193
Référence CVE CVE-2017-15010
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-15010
Référence CVE CVE-2018-20346
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-20346
Référence CVE CVE-2018-20505
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-20505
Référence CVE CVE-2018-20506
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-20506
Référence CVE CVE-2019-12900
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-12900
Référence CVE CVE-2019-16869
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-16869
Référence CVE CVE-2019-20444
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20444
Référence CVE CVE-2019-20445
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20445
Référence CVE CVE-2019-20478
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20478
Référence CVE CVE-2019-9020
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=C
Official advisory ↗CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2020-AVI-645Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Juniper
Official advisory ↗CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2019-AVI-032Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Apple
n des
correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
Documentation
Bulletin de sécurité Apple HT209443 du 22 janvier 2019
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT209443
Bulletin de sécurité Apple HT209446 du 22 janvier 2019
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT209446
Bulletin de sécurité Apple HT209447 du 22 janvier 2019
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT209447
Bulletin de sécurité Apple HT209448 du 22 janvier 2019
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT209448
Bulletin de sécurité Apple HT209449 du 22 janvier 2019
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT209449
Bulletin de sécurité Apple HT209451 du 22 janvier 2019
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT209451
Référence CVE CVE-2018-20346
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-20346
Référence CVE CVE-2018-20505
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-20505
Référence CVE CVE-2018-20506
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-20506
Référence CVE CVE-2018-4452
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-4452
Référence CVE CVE-2018-4467
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-4467
Référence CVE CVE-2019-6200
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-6200
Référence CVE CVE-2019-6202
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-6202
Référence CVE CVE-2019-6205
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-6205
Référence CVE CVE-2019-6206
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-62
Official advisory ↗JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2018-014533SQLite における整数オーバーフローの脆弱性
Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.
Status ?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
The problem is corrected in the following product versions: B&R Automation Studio 6.5 B&R recommends that customers apply the update at earliest convenience. The process to install updates is described in the user manual. The step to identify the installed product version is described in the user manual.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04
Evidence and provenance
Published 21 Dec 2018 · Last source change 5 Aug 2024, 11:58 UTC · CWE-190 · Integer Overflow or Wraparound
CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source ?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.FIRST · tracked since 2026-09-01
Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
Before
n/a · Fixed: An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
After
n/a · Fixed: The problem is corrected in the following product versions: B&R Automation Studio 6.5 B&R recommends that customers apply the update at earliest convenience. The process to install updates is described in the user manual. The step to identify the installed product version is described in the user manual.
Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
Before
n/a · Fixed: No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
After
n/a · Fixed: An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.