BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2019
CVE-2018-16881High confidence

A denial of service vulnerability was found in rsyslog in the imptcp module

The rsyslog Project · rsyslog:

Official source article: Red Hat RHSA-2019:2110 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

7.5HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 2.24% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs The rsyslog Project rsyslog: and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

4 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcersyslogVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.8.27.0-2Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcersyslogVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.8.27.0-2Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcersyslogVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.8.27.0-2Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcersyslogVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.8.27.0-2Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2018-8671

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

A denial of service vulnerability was found in rsyslog in the imptcp module. An attacker could send a specially crafted message to the imptcp socket, which would cause rsyslog to crash. Versions before 8.27.0 are vulnerable.

What

A denial of service vulnerability was found in rsyslog in the imptcp module. An attacker could send a specially crafted message to the imptcp socket, which would cause rsyslog to crash. Versions before 8.27.0 are vulnerable.

Why

The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

A denial of service vulnerability was found in rsyslog in the imptcp module. An attacker could send a specially crafted message to the imptcp socket, which would cause rsyslog to crash. Versions before 8.27.0 are vulnerable.

Why

The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Integer Overflow or Wraparound → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-190 ↗

CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound. The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedDenial of serviceCWE-190
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-267Multiples vulnérabilités dans Juniper Networks Junos Space

d?id=CVE-2018-15861 Référence CVE CVE-2018-15862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-15862 Référence CVE CVE-2018-15863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-15863 Référence CVE CVE-2018-15864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-15864 Référence CVE CVE-2018-16062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-16062 Référence CVE CVE-2018-16395 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-16395 Référence CVE CVE-2018-16396 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-16396 Référence CVE CVE-2018-16402 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-16402 Référence CVE CVE-2018-16403 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-16403 Référence CVE CVE-2018-16881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-16881 Référence CVE CVE-2018-18066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-18066 Référence CVE CVE-2018-18310 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-18310 Référence CVE CVE-2018-18311 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-18311 Référence CVE CVE-2018-18384 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-18384 Référence CVE CVE-2018-18520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-18520 Référence CVE CVE-2018-18521 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-18521 Référence CVE CVE-2018-18751 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-18751 Référence CVE CVE-2018-19519 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2020-AVI-420Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Juniper

-2017-14867 Référence CVE CVE-2017-15298 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-15298 Référence CVE CVE-2017-7895 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-7895 Référence CVE CVE-2017-9935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-9935 Référence CVE CVE-2018-1000021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1000021 Référence CVE CVE-2018-1000180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1000180 Référence CVE CVE-2018-1000613 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1000613 Référence CVE CVE-2018-11233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-11233 Référence CVE CVE-2018-11235 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-11235 Référence CVE CVE-2018-16881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-16881 Référence CVE CVE-2018-19486 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-19486 Référence CVE CVE-2018-3639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-3639 Référence CVE CVE-2018-5360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-5360 Référence CVE CVE-2018-5382 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-5382 Référence CVE CVE-2019-0131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-0131 Référence CVE CVE-2019-0165 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-0165 Référence CVE CVE-2019-0166 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-0166 Référence CVE CVE-2019-0168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-0168

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2018-013889rsyslog における整数オーバーフローの脆弱性

rsyslog には、整数オーバーフローの脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
rsyslog:: 8.27.0
Fixed
An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
A mitigation or workaround reference is available from the source linked below; validate it against the affected product and version.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 25 Jan 2019 · Last source change 5 Aug 2024, 10:32 UTC · CWE-190 · Integer Overflow or Wraparound

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-09-01
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2018-8671
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. ENISA EUVD mappingEUVD-2018-8671 was added to the official ENISA EUVD mapping for this CVE.
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    {"euvdId":"EUVD-2018-8671"}
    ENISA EUVD ↗
  2. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed: added patch: bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-16881; added remediation: bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-16881; removed vendor advisory: access.redhat.com/RHBA-2019:2501; removed vendor advisory: access.redhat.com/RHSA-2019:2110; 2 further removals.
    Before
    vendor advisory: access.redhat.com/RHBA-2019:2501 · vendor advisory: access.redhat.com/RHSA-2019:2110 · vendor advisory: access.redhat.com/RHSA-2019:2437 · 1 more references
    After
    patch: bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-16881 · remediation: bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-16881
    bugzilla.redhat.com ↗
  3. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    8.27.0 · Fixed: No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
    After
    8.27.0 · Fixed: An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
    CNA ↗
  4. Remediation statusRemediation status changed from Awaiting fix to Patch available.
    Before
    Awaiting fix
    After
    Patch available
    bugzilla.redhat.com ↗
  5. SeveritySeverity changed from Medium to High.
    Before
    Medium
    After
    High
    NIST NVD ↗
  6. CVSS scoreCVSS score changed from 5.3 (CVSS 3.0 · CNA · CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L) to 7.5 (CVSS 3.1 · NIST NVD · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).
    Before
    5.3 (CVSS 3.0 · CNA · CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L)
    After
    7.5 (CVSS 3.1 · NIST NVD · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H)
    NIST NVD ↗
  7. Catalogue recordCVE added to the BlackTree catalogue.
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2018-16881 · cve.blacktree.nl