BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2018
CVE-2018-11813High confidence

libjpeg 9c has a large loop because read_pixel in rdtarga.c mishandles EOF

Unknown · Unknown

7.5HighCVSS 3.0
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Fix not verified
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 3.19% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Unknown Unknown and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Recheck the vendor advisory before scheduling a change because no verified fixed version is currently retained.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Alpine, Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

9 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Alpine v3.23v3.23 · mainlibjpeg-turboVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.1.5.3-r3Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.22v3.22 · mainlibjpeg-turboVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.1.5.3-r3Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.21v3.21 · mainlibjpeg-turboVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.1.5.3-r3Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelibjpeg-turboVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:2.0.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelibjpeg-turboVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:2.0.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelibjpeg-turboVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:2.0.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelibjpeg-turboVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:2.0.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelibjpeg9Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:9d-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelibjpeg6bUnder evaluationCanonical reports that the package might be affected and still needs evaluation or fixing.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2018-3805

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Fix not verified
01

What, why and how

libjpeg 9c has a large loop because read_pixel in rdtarga.c mishandles EOF.

What

libjpeg 9c has a large loop because read_pixel in rdtarga.c mishandles EOF.

Why

The product performs an iteration or loop without sufficiently limiting the number of times that the loop is executed.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

libjpeg 9c has a large loop because read_pixel in rdtarga.c mishandles EOF.

Why

The product performs an iteration or loop without sufficiently limiting the number of times that the loop is executed.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Excessive Iteration → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-834 ↗

CWE-834: Excessive Iteration. The product performs an iteration or loop without sufficiently limiting the number of times that the loop is executed.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.0: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-834
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2022-0517Red Hat Enterprise Linux: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer oder authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Red Hat Enterprise Linux ausnutzen, um dadurch die Integrität, Vertraulichkeit und Verfügbarkeit zu gefährden.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0969Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

1000076 Référence CVE CVE-2018-1000077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1000077 Référence CVE CVE-2018-1000078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1000078 Référence CVE CVE-2018-1000079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1000079 Référence CVE CVE-2018-10804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-10804 Référence CVE CVE-2018-10805 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-10805 Référence CVE CVE-2018-10919 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-10919 Référence CVE CVE-2018-11655 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-11655 Référence CVE CVE-2018-11656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-11656 Référence CVE CVE-2018-11813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-11813 Référence CVE CVE-2018-12599 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-12599 Référence CVE CVE-2018-12600 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-12600 Référence CVE CVE-2018-13153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-13153 Référence CVE CVE-2018-13410 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-13410 Référence CVE CVE-2018-13440 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-13440 Référence CVE CVE-2018-14434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-14434 Référence CVE CVE-2018-14437 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-14437 Référence CVE CVE-2018-14628 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-267Multiples vulnérabilités dans Juniper Networks Junos Space

VERecord?id=CVE-2018-1116 Référence CVE CVE-2018-11212 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-11212 Référence CVE CVE-2018-11213 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-11213 Référence CVE CVE-2018-11214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-11214 Référence CVE CVE-2018-1122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1122 Référence CVE CVE-2018-1124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1124 Référence CVE CVE-2018-1126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1126 Référence CVE CVE-2018-11782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-11782 Référence CVE CVE-2018-11806 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-11806 Référence CVE CVE-2018-11813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-11813 Référence CVE CVE-2018-12126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-12126 Référence CVE CVE-2018-12127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-12127 Référence CVE CVE-2018-12130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-12130 Référence CVE CVE-2018-12207 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-12207 Référence CVE CVE-2018-12327 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-12327 Référence CVE CVE-2018-12641 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-12641 Référence CVE CVE-2018-12697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-12697 Référence CVE CVE-2018-12910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2018-006162libjpeg におけるリソース管理に関する脆弱性

libjpeg には、リソース管理に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix not verified
Affected
n/a
Fixed
No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
Action
No verified patch reference is present in the current structured sources. Check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 6 Jun 2018 · Last source change 5 Aug 2024, 08:17 UTC · CWE-834 · Excessive Iteration

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-09-01
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2018-3805
Product sourceUnavailable
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. ENISA EUVD mappingEUVD-2018-3805 was added to the official ENISA EUVD mapping for this CVE.
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    {"euvdId":"EUVD-2018-3805"}
    ENISA EUVD ↗
  2. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed: removed vendor advisory: access.redhat.com/RHSA-2019:2052; removed vendor advisory: lists.opensuse.org/msg00015.html.
    Before
    vendor advisory: access.redhat.com/RHSA-2019:2052 · vendor advisory: lists.opensuse.org/msg00015.html
    After
    no authoritative guidance recorded
    CNA ↗
  3. SeveritySeverity changed from Unknown to High.
    Before
    Unknown
    After
    High
    NIST NVD ↗
  4. CVSS scoreCVSS score changed from not recorded to 7.5 (CVSS 3.0 · NIST NVD · CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    7.5 (CVSS 3.0 · NIST NVD · CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H)
    NIST NVD ↗
  5. Catalogue recordCVE added to the BlackTree catalogue.
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2018-11813 · cve.blacktree.nl