BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2018
CVE-2017-5130High confidence

n/a Google Chrome prior to 62.0.3202.62: Integer Overflow or Wraparound

Unknown · Google Chrome prior to 62.0.3202.62

8.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Mitigation available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 2.71% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Apply the linked authoritative mitigation while planning the permanent fix.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Unknown Google Chrome prior to 62.0.3202.62 and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Recheck the vendor advisory before scheduling a change because no verified fixed version is currently retained.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

4 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelibxml2Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.9.4+dfsg1-5.1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelibxml2Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.9.4+dfsg1-5.1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelibxml2Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.9.4+dfsg1-5.1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelibxml2Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.9.4+dfsg1-5.1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2017-14239

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Mitigation available
01

What, why and how

An integer overflow in xmlmemory.c in libxml2 before 2.9.5, as used in Google Chrome prior to 62.0.3202.62 and other products, allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted XML file.

What

An integer overflow in xmlmemory.c in libxml2 before 2.9.5, as used in Google Chrome prior to 62.0.3202.62 and other products, allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted XML file.

Why

The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

An integer overflow in xmlmemory.c in libxml2 before 2.9.5, as used in Google Chrome prior to 62.0.3202.62 and other products, allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted XML file.

Why

The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Integer Overflow or Wraparound → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
Required interaction required
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-190 ↗

CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound. The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UIRequiredUser interaction: Another user must perform an action for exploitation to succeed.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-190
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2023-1614Tenable Security Nessus Network Monitor: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer, authentisierter oder lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Tenable Security Nessus Network Monitor ausnutzen, um beliebigen Code auszuführen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand auszulösen und Daten zu manipulieren.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1427Google Chrome: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Google Chrome ausnutzen, um Informationen einzusehen, Sicherheitsmechanismen zu umgehen, Daten zu manipulieren, einen Denial of Service herbeizuführen oder Code mit den Privilegien des Angegriffenen zur Ausführung zu bringen.

Official advisory ↗
Canadian Centre for Cyber Security · English · AV17-155Google Releases security update for Chrome

The stable channel has been updated to version 62.0.3202.62 for Windows, Mac, and Linux. This update addresses vulnerabilities in Google Chrome. CVE Reference: CVE-2017-15386, CVE-2017-15387, CVE-2017-15388, CVE-2017-15389, CVE-2017-15390, CVE-2017-15391, CVE-2017-15392, CVE-2017-15393, CVE-2017-15394, CVE-2017-15395, CVE-2017-5124, CVE-2017-5125, CVE-2017-5126, CVE-2017-5127, CVE-2017-5128, CVE-2017-5129, CVE-2017-5130, CVE-2017-5131, CVE-2017-5132, CVE-2017-5133

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2023-AVI-0499Multiples vulnérabilités dans Tenable Nessus Network Monitor

d=CVE-2016-9597 Référence CVE CVE-2016-9598 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-9598 Référence CVE CVE-2017-1000061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-1000061 Référence CVE CVE-2017-1000381 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-1000381 Référence CVE CVE-2017-15412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-15412 Référence CVE CVE-2017-16931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-16931 Référence CVE CVE-2017-16932 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-16932 Référence CVE CVE-2017-18258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-18258 Référence CVE CVE-2017-5029 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-5029 Référence CVE CVE-2017-5130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-5130 Référence CVE CVE-2017-5969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-5969 Référence CVE CVE-2017-7375 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-7375 Référence CVE CVE-2017-7376 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-7376 Référence CVE CVE-2017-8872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-8872 Référence CVE CVE-2017-9047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-9047 Référence CVE CVE-2017-9048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-9048 Référence CVE CVE-2017-9049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-9049 Référence CVE CVE-2017-9050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-9050 Ré

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-267Multiples vulnérabilités dans Juniper Networks Junos Space

g/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-18207 Référence CVE CVE-2017-18258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-18258 Référence CVE CVE-2017-18267 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-18267 Référence CVE CVE-2017-18551 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-18551 Référence CVE CVE-2017-2810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-2810 Référence CVE CVE-2017-3735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-3735 Référence CVE CVE-2017-3736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-3736 Référence CVE CVE-2017-3737 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-3737 Référence CVE CVE-2017-3738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-3738 Référence CVE CVE-2017-5130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-5130 Référence CVE CVE-2017-5715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-5715 Référence CVE CVE-2017-5992 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-5992 Référence CVE CVE-2017-6462 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-6462 Référence CVE CVE-2017-6463 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-6463 Référence CVE CVE-2017-6464 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-6464 Référence CVE CVE-2017-6519 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-6519 Référence CVE CVE-2017-7375 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-7375 Référence CVE CVE-2017-7376 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-7376 Ré

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2017-AVI-364Multiples vulnérabilités dans Google Chrome

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans Google Chrome. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un problème de sécurité non spécifié par l'éditeur, un contournement de la politique de sécurité et une injection de code indirecte à distance (XSS).

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2017-012477libxml2 における境界外書き込みに関する脆弱性

libxml2 には、境界外書き込みに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Mitigation available
Affected
Google Chrome prior to 62.0.3202.62: Google Chrome prior to 62.0.3202.62
Fixed
No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
Action
CCIRC recommends that system administrators test and deploy the vendor-released updates to affected applications accordingly. References: https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2017/10/stable-channel-update-for-desktop.html
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 7 Feb 2018 · Last source change 3 Dec 2025, 22:02 UTC · CWE-190 · Integer Overflow or Wraparound

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCISA ADP
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-09-01
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2017-14239
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCISA ADP
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. ENISA EUVD mappingEUVD-2017-14239 was added to the official ENISA EUVD mapping for this CVE.
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    {"euvdId":"EUVD-2017-14239"}
    ENISA EUVD ↗
  2. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed: added vendor advisory: chromereleases.googleblog.com/stable-channel-update-for-desktop.html; removed vendor advisory: access.redhat.com/RHSA-2017:2997; removed vendor advisory: security.gentoo.org/201710-24.
    Before
    vendor advisory: access.redhat.com/RHSA-2017:2997 · vendor advisory: security.gentoo.org/201710-24
    After
    vendor advisory: chromereleases.googleblog.com/stable-channel-update-for-desktop.html
    chromereleases.googleblog.com ↗
  3. Catalogue recordCVE added to the BlackTree catalogue.
    CNA ↗
  4. Remediation statusRemediation status changed from Awaiting fix to Mitigation available.
    Before
    Awaiting fix
    After
    Mitigation available
    Canadian Centre for Cyber Security ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2017-5130 · cve.blacktree.nl