High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.
Patch available
Distribution package intelligence
Ubuntu vendor package status
Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.
7 package states
Repository candidate not checked
A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.
Ubuntu release
Source package
Vendor state
Fixed version
Evidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive
linux-azure-6.11
Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.
Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.
Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.
Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.
Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.
Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.
Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.
National CERT insights ?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.
Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.
Official European source
ENISA European Vulnerability Database
Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.
1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier
EUVD-2017-7290
No EUVD known-exploited evidence
ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.
EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days
High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.
Patch available
01
What, why and how
The bnep_add_connection function in net/bluetooth/bnep/core.c in the Linux kernel before 3.19 does not ensure that an l2cap socket is available, which allows local users to gain privileges via a crafted application.
What
The bnep_add_connection function in net/bluetooth/bnep/core.c in the Linux kernel before 3.19 does not ensure that an l2cap socket is available, which allows local users to gain privileges via a crafted application.
Why
The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.
How
An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.
What
The bnep_add_connection function in net/bluetooth/bnep/core.c in the Linux kernel before 3.19 does not ensure that an l2cap socket is available, which allows local users to gain privileges via a crafted application.
Why
The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.
How
An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.
02
Exploit reality and attack path
CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.
Observed exploitation ?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.No confirmed evidence
No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.
Public PoC / exploit material ?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.None recorded
No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.
Likely attack path
local access → Improper Input Validation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness ?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-20: Improper Input Validation. The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.
CVSS vector ?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.
AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-20
A
Official authority intelligence
Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2017-7290Official EUVD mapping
0 linked advisory records.
Official EUVD record ↗CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2018-AVI-094Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu
Official advisory ↗CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2018-AVI-060Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de
SUSE . Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de
code et une élévation de privilèges.
Official advisory ↗CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2018-AVI-051Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE
au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des
correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
Documentation
Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2018:0180-1 du 23 janvier 2018
https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2018/suse-su-20180180-1/
Référence CVE CVE-2017-11600
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-11600
Référence CVE CVE-2017-13167
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-13167
Référence CVE CVE-2017-14106
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-14106
Référence CVE CVE-2017-15102
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-15102
Référence CVE CVE-2017-15115
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-15115
Référence CVE CVE-2017-15868
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-15868
Référence CVE CVE-2017-16525
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-16525
Référence CVE CVE-2017-16527
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-16527
Référence CVE CVE-2017-16529
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-16529
Référence CVE CVE-2017-16531
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-16531
Référence CVE CVE-2017-16534
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-16534
Référence CVE CVE-2017-16535
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-16535
Référence CVE CVE-2017-16536
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-16536
Référence CVE CVE-2017-16537
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=
Official advisory ↗CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2018-AVI-032Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de
SUSE . Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un
problème de sécurité non spécifié par l'éditeur, un déni de service et
un contournement de la politique de sécurité.
Official advisory ↗CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2018-AVI-018Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de
Debian. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un déni de service,
une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et une élévation de
privilèges.
Official advisory ↗CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2018-AVI-014Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE
Official advisory ↗CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2018-AVI-009Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de
SUSE . Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un
déni de service, un contournement de la politique de sécurité et une
atteinte à la confidentialité des données.
Official advisory ↗CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2018-AVI-005Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de
SUSE . Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un
problème de sécurité non spécifié par l'éditeur, un déni de service et
une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.
Official advisory ↗CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2017-AVI-449Multiples vulnérabilités dans Google Android
Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.
Status ?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
Before
n/a · Fixed: No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
After
n/a · Fixed: An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.