BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2017
CVE-2017-13716High confidence

Affected product: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

Unknown · Unknown

5.5MediumCVSS 3.0
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 4 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Medium, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 1.40% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Unknown Unknown and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 4 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

6 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 4 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcebinutilsAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcebinutilsAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcebinutilsAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcebinutilsAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivebinutilsUnder evaluationCanonical reports that the package might be affected and still needs evaluation or fixing.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 4 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelibibertyUnder evaluationCanonical reports that the package might be affected and still needs evaluation or fixing.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 4 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2017-5233

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 4 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

The C++ symbol demangler routine in cplus-dem.c in libiberty, as distributed in GNU Binutils 2.29, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (excessive memory allocation and application crash) via a crafted file, as demonstrated by a call from the Binary File Descriptor (BFD) library (aka libbfd).

What

The C++ symbol demangler routine in cplus-dem.c in libiberty, as distributed in GNU Binutils 2.29, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (excessive memory allocation and application crash) via a crafted file, as demonstrated by a call from the Binary File Descriptor (BFD) library (aka libbfd).

Why

The product allocates a reusable resource or group of resources on behalf of an actor without imposing any intended restrictions on the size or number of resources that can be allocated.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

The C++ symbol demangler routine in cplus-dem.c in libiberty, as distributed in GNU Binutils 2.29, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (excessive memory allocation and application crash) via a crafted file, as demonstrated by a call from the Binary File Descriptor (BFD) library (aka libbfd).

Why

The product allocates a reusable resource or group of resources on behalf of an actor without imposing any intended restrictions on the size or number of resources that can be allocated.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
Required interaction required
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-770 ↗

CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling. The product allocates a reusable resource or group of resources on behalf of an actor without imposing any intended restrictions on the size or number of resources that can be allocated.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.0: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UIRequiredUser interaction: Another user must perform an action for exploitation to succeed.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
UnauthenticatedDenial of serviceCWE-770
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-8553 Référence CVE CVE-2016-2568 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-2568 Référence CVE CVE-2016-2781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-2781 Référence CVE CVE-2016-8660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-8660 Référence CVE CVE-2017-0537 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-0537 Référence CVE CVE-2017-11164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-11164 Référence CVE CVE-2017-13165 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-13165 Référence CVE CVE-2017-13693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-13693 Référence CVE CVE-2017-13694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-13694 Référence CVE CVE-2017-13716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-13716 Référence CVE CVE-2018-1121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1121 Référence CVE CVE-2018-12928 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-12928 Référence CVE CVE-2018-12929 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-12929 Référence CVE CVE-2018-12930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-12930 Référence CVE CVE-2018-12931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-12931 Référence CVE CVE-2018-17977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-17977 Référence CVE CVE-2018-6952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-6952 Référence CVE CVE-2018-8956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-8553 Référence CVE CVE-2016-2568 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-2568 Référence CVE CVE-2016-2781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-2781 Référence CVE CVE-2016-8660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-8660 Référence CVE CVE-2017-0537 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-0537 Référence CVE CVE-2017-11164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-11164 Référence CVE CVE-2017-13165 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-13165 Référence CVE CVE-2017-13693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-13693 Référence CVE CVE-2017-13694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-13694 Référence CVE CVE-2017-13716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-13716 Référence CVE CVE-2018-1121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1121 Référence CVE CVE-2018-12928 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-12928 Référence CVE CVE-2018-12929 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-12929 Référence CVE CVE-2018-12930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-12930 Référence CVE CVE-2018-12931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-12931 Référence CVE CVE-2018-17977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-17977 Référence CVE CVE-2018-6952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-6952 Référence CVE CVE-2018-8956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-650Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Juniper

CVE-2016-9539 Référence CVE CVE-2017-0553 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-0553 Référence CVE CVE-2017-1000158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-1000158 Référence CVE CVE-2017-1000368 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-1000368 Référence CVE CVE-2017-10684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-10684 Référence CVE CVE-2017-10685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-10685 Référence CVE CVE-2017-10989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-10989 Référence CVE CVE-2017-11164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-11164 Référence CVE CVE-2017-12562 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-12562 Référence CVE CVE-2017-13716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-13716 Référence CVE CVE-2017-14062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-14062 Référence CVE CVE-2017-14867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-14867 Référence CVE CVE-2017-14930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-14930 Référence CVE CVE-2017-15095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-15095 Référence CVE CVE-2017-15412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-15412 Référence CVE CVE-2017-15994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-15994 Référence CVE CVE-2017-16548 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-16548 Référence CVE CVE-2017-16931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2017-007334GNU Binutils におけるリソース管理に関する脆弱性

GNU Binutils には、リソース管理に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
n/a
Fixed
An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 28 Aug 2017 · Last source change 16 Sept 2024, 18:34 UTC · CWE-770 · Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-09-01
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2017-5233
Product sourceUnavailable
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. ENISA EUVD mappingEUVD-2017-5233 was added to the official ENISA EUVD mapping for this CVE.
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    {"euvdId":"EUVD-2017-5233"}
    ENISA EUVD ↗
  2. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed: added patch: sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22009; added remediation: sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22009.
    Before
    no authoritative guidance recorded
    After
    patch: sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22009 · remediation: sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22009
    sourceware.org ↗
  3. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    n/a · Fixed: No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
    After
    n/a · Fixed: An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
    CNA ↗
  4. Remediation statusRemediation status changed from Awaiting fix to Patch available.
    Before
    Awaiting fix
    After
    Patch available
    sourceware.org ↗
  5. SeveritySeverity changed from Unknown to Medium.
    Before
    Unknown
    After
    Medium
    NIST NVD ↗
  6. CVSS scoreCVSS score changed from not recorded to 5.5 (CVSS 3.0 · NIST NVD · CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    5.5 (CVSS 3.0 · NIST NVD · CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H)
    NIST NVD ↗
  7. Catalogue recordCVE added to the BlackTree catalogue.
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2017-13716 · cve.blacktree.nl