BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2017
CVE-2017-11610High confidence

Affected product: Incorrect Default Permissions

Unknown · Unknown

Official source article: Red Hat RHSA-2017:3005 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

8.8HighCVSS 3.0
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Fix not verified
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Critical, raised one band.upgradedsince 5 Aug 2024

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • A structured source references public exploit or proof-of-concept material.
  • EPSS is 87.38% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Increase monitoring for the attack path and post-exploitation behaviour described in the report.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Unknown Unknown and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Recheck the vendor advisory before scheduling a change because no verified fixed version is currently retained.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 3 daysRemediation target: Within 90 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Alpine, Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

7 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Alpine v3.23v3.23 · mainsupervisorVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.3.2.4-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.22v3.22 · mainsupervisorVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.3.2.4-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.21v3.21 · mainsupervisorVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.3.2.4-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Debian trixietrixie · sourcesupervisorVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.3.3.1-1.1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcesupervisorVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.3.3.1-1.1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcesupervisorVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.3.3.1-1.1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcesupervisorVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.3.3.1-1.1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2017-0132

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Fix not verified
01

What, why and how

The XML-RPC server in supervisor before 3.0.1, 3.1.x before 3.1.4, 3.2.x before 3.2.4, and 3.3.x before 3.3.3 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted XML-RPC request, related to nested supervisord namespace lookups.

What

The XML-RPC server in supervisor before 3.0.1, 3.1.x before 3.1.4, 3.2.x before 3.2.4, and 3.3.x before 3.3.3 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted XML-RPC request, related to nested supervisord namespace lookups.

Why

During installation, installed file permissions are set to allow anyone to modify those files.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.

What

The XML-RPC server in supervisor before 3.0.1, 3.1.x before 3.1.4, 3.2.x before 3.2.4, and 3.3.x before 3.3.3 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted XML-RPC request, related to nested supervisord namespace lookups.

Why

During installation, installed file permissions are set to allow anyone to modify those files.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
Reference recorded

A structured CVE source labels at least one public reference as exploit material. BlackTree has not independently validated that it is safe, reliable or weaponised.

Likely attack path
a network path → Incorrect Default Permissions → execute code or commands in the affected security context
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-276 ↗

CWE-276: Incorrect Default Permissions. During installation, installed file permissions are set to allow anyone to modify those files.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.0: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
After compromise, an attacker may use built-in shells, scripting engines, scheduled tasks and native network utilities for discovery, persistence or movement. This is a plausible LoTL path, not evidence that it has occurred for every attack.
NetworkRemote code executionCWE-276Public exploit reference
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2019-AVI-014Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Juniper

?id=CVE-2016-3627 Référence CVE CVE-2016-3705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-3705 Référence CVE CVE-2016-4447 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-4447 Référence CVE CVE-2016-4448 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-4448 Référence CVE CVE-2016-4449 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-4449 Référence CVE CVE-2017-0861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-0861 Référence CVE CVE-2017-1000364 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-1000364 Référence CVE CVE-2017-1000366 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-1000366 Référence CVE CVE-2017-1000379 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-1000379 Référence CVE CVE-2017-11610 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-11610 Référence CVE CVE-2017-13672 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-13672 Référence CVE CVE-2017-15265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-15265 Référence CVE CVE-2017-18258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-18258 Référence CVE CVE-2017-2619 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-2619 Référence CVE CVE-2017-3136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-3136 Référence CVE CVE-2017-3137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-3137 Référence CVE CVE-2017-3142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-3142 Référence CVE CVE-2017-3143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2017-007419supervisor におけるアクセス制御に関する脆弱性

supervisor には、アクセス制御に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix not verified
Affected
n/a
Fixed
No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
Action
No verified patch reference is present in the current structured sources. Check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 23 Aug 2017 · Last source change 5 Aug 2024, 18:12 UTC · CWE-276 · Incorrect Default Permissions

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-09-01
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2017-0132
Product sourceUnavailable
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. ENISA EUVD mappingEUVD-2017-0132 was added to the official ENISA EUVD mapping for this CVE.
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    {"euvdId":"EUVD-2017-0132"}
    ENISA EUVD ↗
  2. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed: added vendor advisory: github.com/964; added vendor advisory: github.com/CHANGES.txt; removed vendor advisory: access.redhat.com/RHSA-2017:3005; removed vendor advisory: debian.org/dsa-3942; 4 further removals.
    Before
    vendor advisory: access.redhat.com/RHSA-2017:3005 · vendor advisory: debian.org/dsa-3942 · vendor advisory: lists.fedoraproject.org/4GMSCGMM477N64Z3BM34RWYBGSLK466B · 3 more references
    After
    vendor advisory: github.com/964 · vendor advisory: github.com/CHANGES.txt
    github.com ↗
  3. SeveritySeverity changed from Unknown to High.
    Before
    Unknown
    After
    High
    NIST NVD ↗
  4. CVSS scoreCVSS score changed from not recorded to 8.8 (CVSS 3.0 · NIST NVD · CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    8.8 (CVSS 3.0 · NIST NVD · CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H)
    NIST NVD ↗
  5. Catalogue recordCVE added to the BlackTree catalogue.
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2017-11610 · cve.blacktree.nl