BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2016
CVE-2016-8858High confidence

Affected product: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Unknown · Unknown

7.5HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Critical, raised one band.upgradedsince 22 Oct 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 29.46% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Unknown Unknown and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 3 daysRemediation target: Within 90 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

4 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourceopensshVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:7.3p1-2Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 22 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourceopensshVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:7.3p1-2Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 22 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourceopensshVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:7.3p1-2Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 22 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourceopensshVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:7.3p1-2Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 22 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2016-9683

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

The kex_input_kexinit function in kex.c in OpenSSH 6.x and 7.x through 7.3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) by sending many duplicate KEXINIT requests. NOTE: a third party reports that "OpenSSH upstream does not consider this as a security issue."

What

The kex_input_kexinit function in kex.c in OpenSSH 6.x and 7.x through 7.3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) by sending many duplicate KEXINIT requests. NOTE: a third party reports that "OpenSSH upstream does not consider this as a security issue."

Why

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

The kex_input_kexinit function in kex.c in OpenSSH 6.x and 7.x through 7.3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) by sending many duplicate KEXINIT requests. NOTE: a third party reports that "OpenSSH upstream does not consider this as a security issue."

Why

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Uncontrolled Resource Consumption → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-400 ↗

CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption. The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedDenial of serviceCWE-400
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1052OpenSSH: Schwachstelle ermöglicht Denial of Service

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann eine Schwachstelle in OpenSSH ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Canadian Centre for Cyber Security · English · AV18-011Juniper Networks security bulletins

eries Junos OS versions 16.1X65 prior to 16.1X65-D45 Junos OS versions 16.2 prior to 16.2R2, 16.2R2-S2, 16.2R3 Junos OS versions 16.2 prior to 16.2R3 on MX series Junos OS versions 17.1 prior to 17.1R2-S5, 17.1R3 and 17.1R3 on MX series Junos OS versions 17.2X75 prior to 17.2X75-D50 CTPView versions 7.1, 7.2 and 7.3. Junos Space prior to 17.2R1 Security Director and Log Collector prior to 17.2R1 ScreenOS all versions without the latest security patch CVE Reference: CVE-2015-5174, CVE-2015-5188, CVE-2015-5220, CVE-2015-5304, CVE-2015-5600, CVE-2015-6563, CVE-2015-6564, CVE-2015-7236, CVE-2015-7501, CVE-2016-2141, CVE-2016-8655, CVE-2016-8743, CVE-2016-8858, CVE-2017-1000111, CVE-2017-1000112, CVE-2017-14106, CVE-2017-2634, CVE-2017-3167, CVE-2017-3169, CVE-2017-5645, CVE-2017-5664, CVE-2017-6074, CVE-2017-7668, CVE-2017-7679, CVE-2017-9788, CVE-2017-9798, CVE-2018-0001, CVE-2018-0002, CVE-2018-0003, CVE-2018-0004, CVE-2018-0005, CVE-2018-0006, CVE-2018-0007, CVE-2018-0008, CVE-2018-0009, CVE-2018-0010, CVE-2018-0011, CVE-2018-0012, CVE-2018-0013, CVE-2018-0014 Suggested action CCIRC recommends that system administrators test and deploy the vendor released updates on affected platforms accordingly. References https://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10828&cat=SIRT_1&actp=LIST

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-1094Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-6210 Référence CVE CVE-2016-6302 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-6302 Référence CVE CVE-2016-6303 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-6303 Référence CVE CVE-2016-6304 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-6304 Référence CVE CVE-2016-6305 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-6305 Référence CVE CVE-2016-6306 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-6306 Référence CVE CVE-2016-6307 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-6307 Référence CVE CVE-2016-6308 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-6308 Référence CVE CVE-2016-6515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-6515 Référence CVE CVE-2016-8858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-8858 Référence CVE CVE-2017-15906 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-15906 Référence CVE CVE-2017-3735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-3735 Référence CVE CVE-2018-15473 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-15473 Référence CVE CVE-2018-20685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-20685 Référence CVE CVE-2018-25032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-25032 Référence CVE CVE-2018-4842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-4842 Référence CVE CVE-2018-4848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-4848 Référence CVE CVE-2019-13924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-201

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2020-AVI-618Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Stormshield

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits Stormshield. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un déni de service à distance, une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et une élévation de privilèges.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2018-AVI-026Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Juniper

.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-5304 Référence CVE CVE-2015-5600 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-5600 Référence CVE CVE-2015-6563 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-6563 Référence CVE CVE-2015-6564 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-6564 Référence CVE CVE-2015-7236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-7236 Référence CVE CVE-2015-7501 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-7501 Référence CVE CVE-2016-2141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-2141 Référence CVE CVE-2016-8655 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-8655 Référence CVE CVE-2016-8743 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-8743 Référence CVE CVE-2016-8858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-8858 Référence CVE CVE-2017-1000111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-1000111 Référence CVE CVE-2017-1000112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-1000112 Référence CVE CVE-2017-14106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-14106 Référence CVE CVE-2017-2634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-2634 Référence CVE CVE-2017-3167 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-3167 Référence CVE CVE-2017-3169 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-3169 Référence CVE CVE-2017-5645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-5645 Référence CVE CVE-2017-5664 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2016-006135OpenSSH の kex.c の kex_input_kexinit 関数におけるサービス運用妨害 (DoS) の脆弱性

** 未確定 ** 本件は、脆弱性として確定していません。 OpenSSH の kex.c の kex_input_kexinit 関数には、サービス運用妨害 (メモリ消費) 状態にされる脆弱性が存在します。 なお、サードパーティは「OpenSSH のアップストリームは本件をセキュリティ問題として考慮していない」と報告しています。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
n/a
Fixed
An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 9 Dec 2016 · Last source change 29 May 2026, 20:45 UTC · CWE-400 · Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCISA ADP
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-09-01
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2016-9683
Product sourceUnavailable
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCISA ADP
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. ENISA EUVD mappingEUVD-2016-9683 was added to the official ENISA EUVD mapping for this CVE.
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    {"euvdId":"EUVD-2016-9683"}
    ENISA EUVD ↗
  2. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed: added patch: ftp.openbsd.org/013_ssh_kexinit.patch.sig; added patch: github.com/ec165c392ca54317dbe3064a8c200de6531e89ad; removed vendor advisory: security.freebsd.org/FreeBSD-SA-16:33.openssh.asc; removed vendor advisory: security.gentoo.org/201612-18; 3 further additions.
    Before
    vendor advisory: security.freebsd.org/FreeBSD-SA-16:33.openssh.asc · vendor advisory: security.gentoo.org/201612-18
    After
    patch: ftp.openbsd.org/013_ssh_kexinit.patch.sig · patch: github.com/ec165c392ca54317dbe3064a8c200de6531e89ad · remediation: github.com/ec165c392ca54317dbe3064a8c200de6531e89ad · 2 more references
    github.com ↗
  3. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    n/a · Fixed: No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
    After
    n/a · Fixed: An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
    CNA ↗
  4. Remediation statusRemediation status changed from Awaiting fix to Patch available.
    Before
    Awaiting fix
    After
    Patch available
    github.com ↗
  5. Catalogue recordCVE added to the BlackTree catalogue.
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2016-8858 · cve.blacktree.nl