BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2016
CVE-2016-4449High confidence

Affected product: Improper Input Validation

Unknown · Unknown

7.1HighCVSS 3.0
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Mitigation available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 1.66% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Apply the linked authoritative mitigation while planning the permanent fix.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Unknown Unknown and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Recheck the vendor advisory before scheduling a change because no verified fixed version is currently retained.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

4 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelibxml2Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.9.3+dfsg1-1.1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 22 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelibxml2Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.9.3+dfsg1-1.1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 22 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelibxml2Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.9.3+dfsg1-1.1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 22 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelibxml2Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.9.3+dfsg1-1.1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 22 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

0 current · 1 archived
CVE-2016-4449 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitylibxml2: Inappropriate fetch of entities contentNo longer in the provider’s current catalogue
2 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • libxml2.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
  • libxml2.src as a component of Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Web Server 3
Summary
XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in the xmlStringLenDecodeEntities function in parser.c in libxml2 before 2.9.4, when not in validating mode, allows context-dependent attackers to read arbitrary files or cause a denial of service (resource consumption) via unspecified vectors.
Remediation
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258 For the update to take effect, all applications linked to the libxml2 library must be restarted, or the system rebooted.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2016-5438

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Mitigation available
01

What, why and how

XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in the xmlStringLenDecodeEntities function in parser.c in libxml2 before 2.9.4, when not in validating mode, allows context-dependent attackers to read arbitrary files or cause a denial of service (resource consumption) via unspecified vectors.

What

XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in the xmlStringLenDecodeEntities function in parser.c in libxml2 before 2.9.4, when not in validating mode, allows context-dependent attackers to read arbitrary files or cause a denial of service (resource consumption) via unspecified vectors.

Why

The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may obtain information outside the intended access boundary.

What

XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in the xmlStringLenDecodeEntities function in parser.c in libxml2 before 2.9.4, when not in validating mode, allows context-dependent attackers to read arbitrary files or cause a denial of service (resource consumption) via unspecified vectors.

Why

The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may obtain information outside the intended access boundary.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Improper Input Validation → obtain information outside the intended access boundary
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
Required interaction required
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-20 ↗

CWE-20: Improper Input Validation. The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.0: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UIRequiredUser interaction: Another user must perform an action for exploitation to succeed.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
UnauthenticatedDenial of serviceCWE-20
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2023-1614Tenable Security Nessus Network Monitor: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer, authentisierter oder lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Tenable Security Nessus Network Monitor ausnutzen, um beliebigen Code auszuführen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand auszulösen und Daten zu manipulieren.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-3384libxml2: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in libxml2 ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen, Einblick in vertrauliche Informationen zu erhalten oder Code zur Ausführung zu bringen.

Official advisory ↗
Canadian Centre for Cyber Security · English · AV18-012Oracle Critical Patch updates

s 10.x, 15.x, 16.x, 17.x Siebel Applications, versions 16.0, 17.0 Solaris, versions 10, 11.3 Sun ZFS Storage Appliance Kit (AK), versions prior to 8.7.13 CVE References: CVE-2013-2566, CVE-2014-0114, CVE-2014-7817, CVE-2014-9402, CVE-2015-0293, CVE-2015-1472, CVE-2015-2808, CVE-2015-3195, CVE-2015-3253, CVE-2015-4852, CVE-2015-7501, CVE-2015-7547, CVE-2015-7940, CVE-2016-0635, CVE-2016-0703, CVE-2016-0704, CVE-2016-0800, CVE-2016-1181, CVE-2016-1182, CVE-2016-2105, CVE-2016-2106, CVE-2016-2107, CVE-2016-2109, CVE-2016-2177, CVE-2016-2178, CVE-2016-2179, CVE-2016-2180, CVE-2016-2181, CVE-2016-2182, CVE-2016-2183, CVE-2016-2518, CVE-2016-2550, CVE-2016-4449, CVE-2016-5385, CVE-2016-5387, CVE-2016-6302, CVE-2016-6303, CVE-2016-6304, CVE-2016-6305, CVE-2016-6306, CVE-2016-6307, CVE-2016-6308, CVE-2016-6309, CVE-2016-6814, CVE-2016-7052, CVE-2016-7055, CVE-2016-7977, CVE-2016-8735, CVE-2016-9878, CVE-2017-0781, CVE-2017-0782, CVE-2017-0783, CVE-2017-0785, CVE-2017-3730, CVE-2017-3731, CVE-2017-3732, CVE-2017-3733, CVE-2017-3735, CVE-2017-3736, CVE-2017-3737, CVE-2017-3738, CVE-2017-5461, CVE-2017-5645, CVE-2017-5664, CVE-2017-5715, CVE-2017-9072, CVE-2017-9798, CVE-2017-10068, CVE-2017-10262, CVE-2017-10273, CVE-2017-10282, CVE-2017-10301, CVE-2017-10352, CVE-2017-12617, CVE-2017-13077, CVE-2017-1

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2023-AVI-0499Multiples vulnérabilités dans Tenable Nessus Network Monitor

.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1839 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1840 Référence CVE CVE-2016-2073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-2073 Référence CVE CVE-2016-3189 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-3189 Référence CVE CVE-2016-3627 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-3627 Référence CVE CVE-2016-3705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-3705 Référence CVE CVE-2016-3709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-3709 Référence CVE CVE-2016-4447 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-4447 Référence CVE CVE-2016-4448 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-4448 Référence CVE CVE-2016-4449 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-4449 Référence CVE CVE-2016-4483 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-4483 Référence CVE CVE-2016-4607 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-4607 Référence CVE CVE-2016-4609 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-4609 Référence CVE CVE-2016-4658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-4658 Référence CVE CVE-2016-5131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-5131 Référence CVE CVE-2016-5180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-5180 Référence CVE CVE-2016-9596 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-9596 Référence CVE CVE-2016-9597 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-9597 Ré

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-267Multiples vulnérabilités dans Juniper Networks Junos Space

.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-2183 Référence CVE CVE-2016-2533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-2533 Référence CVE CVE-2016-3076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-3076 Référence CVE CVE-2016-3115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-3115 Référence CVE CVE-2016-3616 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-3616 Référence CVE CVE-2016-3627 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-3627 Référence CVE CVE-2016-4009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-4009 Référence CVE CVE-2016-4447 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-4447 Référence CVE CVE-2016-4448 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-4448 Référence CVE CVE-2016-4449 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-4449 Référence CVE CVE-2016-4658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-4658 Référence CVE CVE-2016-5008 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-5008 Référence CVE CVE-2016-5131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-5131 Référence CVE CVE-2016-5361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-5361 Référence CVE CVE-2016-5391 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-5391 Référence CVE CVE-2016-5636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-5636 Référence CVE CVE-2016-5699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-5699 Référence CVE CVE-2016-6580 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-6580 Ré

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2020-AVI-420Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Juniper

.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-3621 Référence CVE CVE-2016-3627 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-3627 Référence CVE CVE-2016-3632 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-3632 Référence CVE CVE-2016-3705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-3705 Référence CVE CVE-2016-3945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-3945 Référence CVE CVE-2016-3990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-3990 Référence CVE CVE-2016-3991 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-3991 Référence CVE CVE-2016-4447 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-4447 Référence CVE CVE-2016-4448 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-4448 Référence CVE CVE-2016-4449 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-4449 Référence CVE CVE-2016-5314 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-5314 Référence CVE CVE-2016-5616 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-5616 Référence CVE CVE-2016-6136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-6136 Référence CVE CVE-2016-6662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-6662 Référence CVE CVE-2016-6663 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-6663 Référence CVE CVE-2016-9555 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-9555 Référence CVE CVE-2017-1000117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-1000117 Référence CVE CVE-2017-12588 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2019-AVI-014Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Juniper

A10919 du 9 janvier 2019 https://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10919&cat=SIRT_1&actp=LIST Référence CVE CVE-2011-3389 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2011-3389 Référence CVE CVE-2015-1283 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-1283 Référence CVE CVE-2016-2183 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-2183 Référence CVE CVE-2016-3627 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-3627 Référence CVE CVE-2016-3705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-3705 Référence CVE CVE-2016-4447 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-4447 Référence CVE CVE-2016-4448 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-4448 Référence CVE CVE-2016-4449 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-4449 Référence CVE CVE-2017-0861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-0861 Référence CVE CVE-2017-1000364 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-1000364 Référence CVE CVE-2017-1000366 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-1000366 Référence CVE CVE-2017-1000379 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-1000379 Référence CVE CVE-2017-11610 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-11610 Référence CVE CVE-2017-13672 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-13672 Référence CVE CVE-2017-15265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-15265 Référence CVE CVE-2017-18258 https://www.cve.org/CVER

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2017-AVI-012Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Juniper

.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1838 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1839 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1840 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1907 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1907 Référence CVE CVE-2016-3115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-3115 Référence CVE CVE-2016-3627 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-3627 Référence CVE CVE-2016-3705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-3705 Référence CVE CVE-2016-4447 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-4447 Référence CVE CVE-2016-4448 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-4448 Référence CVE CVE-2016-4449 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-4449 Référence CVE CVE-2016-5195 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-5195 Référence CVE CVE-2016-5387 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-5387 Référence CVE CVE-2016-5573 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-5573 Référence CVE CVE-2016-6515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-6515 Référence CVE CVE-2016-6662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-6662 Référence CVE CVE-2017-2300 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-2300 Référence CVE CVE-2017-2302 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-2302 Référence CVE CVE-2017-2303 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-2303 Ré

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2016-AVI-239Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Apple

.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1865 Référence CVE CVE-2016-2105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-2105 Référence CVE CVE-2016-2106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-2106 Référence CVE CVE-2016-2107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-2107 Référence CVE CVE-2016-2108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-2108 Référence CVE CVE-2016-2109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-2109 Référence CVE CVE-2016-2176 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-2176 Référence CVE CVE-2016-4447 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-4447 Référence CVE CVE-2016-4448 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-4448 Référence CVE CVE-2016-4449 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-4449 Référence CVE CVE-2016-4483 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-4483 Référence CVE CVE-2016-4582 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-4582 Référence CVE CVE-2016-4583 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-4583 Référence CVE CVE-2016-4584 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-4584 Référence CVE CVE-2016-4585 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-4585 Référence CVE CVE-2016-4586 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-4586 Référence CVE CVE-2016-4587 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-4587 Référence CVE CVE-2016-4588 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-4588 Ré

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2017-000066サイボウズ Office のAPI に関するサービス運用妨害 (DoS)の脆弱性

サイボウズ株式会社が提供するサイボウズ Office には、API に関するサービス運用妨害(DoS)の脆弱性が存在します。 この脆弱性は、製品利用者への周知を目的に、開発者が JPCERT/CCに報告し、JPCERT/CC が開発者との調整を行いました。

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2016-003103libxml2 の parser.c の xmlStringLenDecodeEntities 関数における XML 外部エンティティの脆弱性

libxml2 の parser.c の xmlStringLenDecodeEntities 関数には、XML 外部エンティティの脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Mitigation available
Affected
n/a
Fixed
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258 For the update to take effect, all applications linked to the libxml2 library must be restarted, or the system rebooted.
Action
CCIRC recommends that system administrators identify their affected assets and potential interdependencies with their organization’s critical services, and follow their patch management process accordingly. References: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.html
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
Official vendor articles6 stored documents

Linked articles are downloaded and versioned as source evidence. A CVE mention or approved update relationship does not, by itself, verify a fix for every product branch.

04

Evidence and provenance

Published 9 Jun 2016 · Last source change 6 Aug 2024, 00:32 UTC · CWE-20 · Improper Input Validation

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-09-01
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2016-5438
Product sourceUnavailable
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed from remediation: access.redhat.com/CVE-2016-4449 to advisory no longer present in the provider's current catalogue.
    Before
    remediation: access.redhat.com/CVE-2016-4449
    After
    advisory no longer present in the provider's current catalogue
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
  2. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    n/a · Fixed: No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
    After
    n/a · Fixed: For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258 For the update to take effect, all applications linked to the libxml2 library must be restarted, or the system rebooted.
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
  3. Remediation statusRemediation status changed from Mitigation available to Patch available.
    Before
    Mitigation available
    After
    Patch available
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
  4. ENISA EUVD mappingEUVD-2016-5438 was added to the official ENISA EUVD mapping for this CVE.
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    {"euvdId":"EUVD-2016-5438"}
    ENISA EUVD ↗
  5. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed: added vendor advisory: git.gnome.org/commit?id=b1d34de46a11323fccffa9fadeb33be670d602f5; removed vendor advisory: access.redhat.com/RHSA-2016:1292; removed vendor advisory: debian.org/dsa-3593; 8 further removals.
    Before
    vendor advisory: access.redhat.com/RHSA-2016:1292 · vendor advisory: debian.org/dsa-3593 · vendor advisory: lists.apple.com/msg00000.html · 7 more references
    After
    vendor advisory: git.gnome.org/commit?id=b1d34de46a11323fccffa9fadeb33be670d602f5
    git.gnome.org ↗
  6. SeveritySeverity changed from Unknown to High.
    Before
    Unknown
    After
    High
    NIST NVD ↗
  7. CVSS scoreCVSS score changed from not recorded to 7.1 (CVSS 3.0 · NIST NVD · CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H).
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    7.1 (CVSS 3.0 · NIST NVD · CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H)
    NIST NVD ↗
  8. Catalogue recordCVE added to the BlackTree catalogue.
    CNA ↗
  9. Remediation statusRemediation status changed from Patch available to Mitigation available.
    Before
    Patch available
    After
    Mitigation available
    Canadian Centre for Cyber Security ↗
  10. Remediation statusRemediation status changed from Awaiting fix to Mitigation available.
    Before
    Awaiting fix
    After
    Mitigation available
    Canadian Centre for Cyber Security ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2016-4449 · cve.blacktree.nl