BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2016
CVE-2016-1834High confidence

Affected product: Heap-based Buffer Overflow

Unknown · Unknown

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • A structured source references public exploit or proof-of-concept material.
  • EPSS is 4.62% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Increase monitoring for the attack path and post-exploitation behaviour described in the report.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Unknown Unknown and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

4 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelibxml2Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.9.3+dfsg1-1.1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 22 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelibxml2Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.9.3+dfsg1-1.1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 22 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelibxml2Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.9.3+dfsg1-1.1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 22 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelibxml2Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.9.3+dfsg1-1.1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 22 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current · 1 archived
CVE-2016-1834 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 26 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2016-1834
1 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • libxml2 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4 LTSS
Summary
Heap-based buffer overflow in the xmlStrncat function in libxml2 before 2.9.4, as used in Apple iOS before 9.3.2, OS X before 10.11.5, tvOS before 9.2.1, and watchOS before 2.2.1, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via a crafted XML document.
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
CVE-2016-1834 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitylibxml2: Heap-buffer-overflow in xmlStrncatNo longer in the provider’s current catalogue
2 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • libxml2.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
  • libxml2.src as a component of Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Web Server 3
Summary
Heap-based buffer overflow in the xmlStrncat function in libxml2 before 2.9.4, as used in Apple iOS before 9.3.2, OS X before 10.11.5, tvOS before 9.2.1, and watchOS before 2.2.1, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via a crafted XML document.
Remediation
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258 For the update to take effect, all applications linked to the libxml2 library must be restarted, or the system rebooted.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2016-2929

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

Heap-based buffer overflow in the xmlStrncat function in libxml2 before 2.9.4, as used in Apple iOS before 9.3.2, OS X before 10.11.5, tvOS before 9.2.1, and watchOS before 2.2.1, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via a crafted XML document.

What

Heap-based buffer overflow in the xmlStrncat function in libxml2 before 2.9.4, as used in Apple iOS before 9.3.2, OS X before 10.11.5, tvOS before 9.2.1, and watchOS before 2.2.1, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via a crafted XML document.

Why

A heap overflow condition is a buffer overflow, where the buffer that can be overwritten is allocated in the heap portion of memory, generally meaning that the buffer was allocated using a routine such as malloc().

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.

What

Heap-based buffer overflow in the xmlStrncat function in libxml2 before 2.9.4, as used in Apple iOS before 9.3.2, OS X before 10.11.5, tvOS before 9.2.1, and watchOS before 2.2.1, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via a crafted XML document.

Why

A heap overflow condition is a buffer overflow, where the buffer that can be overwritten is allocated in the heap portion of memory, generally meaning that the buffer was allocated using a routine such as malloc().

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
Reference recorded

A structured CVE source labels at least one public reference as exploit material. BlackTree has not independently validated that it is safe, reliable or weaponised.

Likely attack path
local access → Heap-based Buffer Overflow → execute code or commands in the affected security context
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
Required interaction required
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-122 ↗

CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow. A heap overflow condition is a buffer overflow, where the buffer that can be overwritten is allocated in the heap portion of memory, generally meaning that the buffer was allocated using a routine such as malloc().

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UIRequiredUser interaction: Another user must perform an action for exploitation to succeed.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
After compromise, an attacker may use built-in shells, scripting engines, scheduled tasks and native network utilities for discovery, persistence or movement. This is a plausible LoTL path, not evidence that it has occurred for every attack.
UnauthenticatedRemote code executionDenial of serviceCWE-122Public exploit reference
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2023-1614Tenable Security Nessus Network Monitor: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer, authentisierter oder lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Tenable Security Nessus Network Monitor ausnutzen, um beliebigen Code auszuführen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand auszulösen und Daten zu manipulieren.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-3383libxml2: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Ausführen von beliebigem Programmcode mit den Rechten des Dienstes

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in libxml2 ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode mit den Rechten des Dienstes auszuführen oder um einen Denial of Service Zustand herbeizuführen.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2023-AVI-0499Multiples vulnérabilités dans Tenable Nessus Network Monitor

.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-8242 Référence CVE CVE-2015-8317 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-8317 Référence CVE CVE-2015-8710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-8710 Référence CVE CVE-2015-8806 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-8806 Référence CVE CVE-2015-9019 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-9019 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1683 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1684 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1762 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1762 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1833 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1833 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1834 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1836 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1837 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1837 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1838 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1839 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1840 Référence CVE CVE-2016-2073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-2073 Référence CVE CVE-2016-3189 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-3189 Référence CVE CVE-2016-3627 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-3627 Ré

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-267Multiples vulnérabilités dans Juniper Networks Junos Space

/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-0772 Référence CVE CVE-2016-0775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-0775 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1000032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1000032 Référence CVE CVE-2016-10746 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-10746 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1494 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1494 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1683 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1684 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1762 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1762 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1833 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1833 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1834 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1836 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1837 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1837 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1838 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1839 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1840 Référence CVE CVE-2016-2183 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-2183 Référence CVE CVE-2016-2533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-2533 Référence CVE CVE-2016-3076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-3076 Ré

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2020-AVI-420Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Juniper

Référence CVE CVE-2016-1000342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1000342 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1000343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1000343 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1000344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1000344 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1000345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1000345 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1000346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1000346 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1000352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1000352 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1762 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1762 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1833 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1833 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1834 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1835 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1836 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1837 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1837 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1838 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1839 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1840 Référence CVE CVE-2016-2324 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-2324 Référence CVE CVE-2016-3621 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-3621 Ré

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2017-AVI-022Multiples vulnérabilités dans Juniper Network and Security Manager

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été corrigées dans Juniper Network and Security Manager . Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, un déni de service à distance et un déni de service.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2017-AVI-012Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Juniper

.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-6563 Référence CVE CVE-2015-6564 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-6564 Référence CVE CVE-2015-6565 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-6565 Référence CVE CVE-2015-8104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-8104 Référence CVE CVE-2015-8325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-8325 Référence CVE CVE-2016-0777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-0777 Référence CVE CVE-2016-0778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-0778 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1762 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1762 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1833 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1833 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1834 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1835 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1836 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1837 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1837 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1838 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1839 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1840 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1907 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1907 Référence CVE CVE-2016-3115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-3115 Ré

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2016-AVI-172Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Apple

.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1825 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1826 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1827 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1827 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1828 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1829 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1830 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1830 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1831 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1831 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1832 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1833 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1833 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1834 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1835 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1836 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1837 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1837 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1838 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1839 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1840 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1841 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1842 Ré

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2016-002812複数の Apple 製品で使用される libxml2 の xmlStrncat 関数におけるヒープベースのバッファオーバーフローの脆弱性

複数の Apple 製品で使用される libxml2 の xmlStrncat 関数には、ヒープベースのバッファオーバーフローの脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
libxml2 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4 LTSS
Fixed
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258 For the update to take effect, all applications linked to the libxml2 library must be restarted, or the system rebooted.
Action
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
Official vendor articles4 stored documents

Linked articles are downloaded and versioned as source evidence. A CVE mention or approved update relationship does not, by itself, verify a fix for every product branch.

04

Evidence and provenance

Published 20 May 2016 · Last source change 4 Dec 2025, 17:15 UTC · CWE-122 · Heap-based Buffer Overflow

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCISA ADP
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-09-01
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2016-2929
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceCISA ADP
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed from remediation: access.redhat.com/CVE-2016-1834 to advisory no longer present in the provider's current catalogue.
    Before
    remediation: access.redhat.com/CVE-2016-1834
    After
    advisory no longer present in the provider's current catalogue
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
  2. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    n/a · Fixed: An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
    After
    n/a · Fixed: For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258 For the update to take effect, all applications linked to the libxml2 library must be restarted, or the system rebooted.
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
  3. ENISA EUVD mappingEUVD-2016-2929 was added to the official ENISA EUVD mapping for this CVE.
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    {"euvdId":"EUVD-2016-2929"}
    ENISA EUVD ↗
  4. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed: added patch: git.gnome.org/commit?id=8fbbf5513d609c1770b391b99e33314cd0742704; added patch: kc.mcafee.com/index?page=content&id=SB10170; removed vendor advisory: access.redhat.com/RHSA-2016:1292; removed vendor advisory: debian.org/dsa-3593; 6 further additions; 2 further removals.
    Before
    vendor advisory: access.redhat.com/RHSA-2016:1292 · vendor advisory: debian.org/dsa-3593 · vendor advisory: lists.apple.com/msg00001.html · 5 more references
    After
    patch: git.gnome.org/commit?id=8fbbf5513d609c1770b391b99e33314cd0742704 · patch: kc.mcafee.com/index?page=content&id=SB10170 · remediation: git.gnome.org/commit?id=8fbbf5513d609c1770b391b99e33314cd0742704 · 9 more references
    git.gnome.org ↗
  5. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    n/a · Fixed: No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
    After
    n/a · Fixed: An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
    CNA ↗
  6. Remediation statusRemediation status changed from Awaiting fix to Patch available.
    Before
    Awaiting fix
    After
    Patch available
    git.gnome.org ↗
  7. Public exploit evidencePublic exploit evidence changed from No public exploit to Public exploit reference.
    Before
    No public exploit
    After
    Public exploit reference
    bugzilla.gnome.org ↗
  8. Catalogue recordCVE added to the BlackTree catalogue.
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2016-1834 · cve.blacktree.nl