BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2016
CVE-2015-8889High confidence

Affected product: security vulnerability

Unknown · Unknown

7.8HighCVSS 3.0
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Mitigation available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 0.55% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Apply the linked authoritative mitigation while planning the permanent fix.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Unknown Unknown and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Recheck the vendor advisory before scheduling a change because no verified fixed version is currently retained.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2015-8745

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Mitigation available
01

What, why and how

The aboot implementation in the Qualcomm components in Android before 2016-07-05 on Nexus 6P devices omits the recovery PIN feature, which has unspecified impact and attack vectors, aka Android internal bug 28822677 and Qualcomm internal bug CR804067.

What

The aboot implementation in the Qualcomm components in Android before 2016-07-05 on Nexus 6P devices omits the recovery PIN feature, which has unspecified impact and attack vectors, aka Android internal bug 28822677 and Qualcomm internal bug CR804067.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

The aboot implementation in the Qualcomm components in Android before 2016-07-05 on Nexus 6P devices omits the recovery PIN feature, which has unspecified impact and attack vectors, aka Android internal bug 28822677 and Qualcomm internal bug CR804067.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
Required interaction required
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-264 ↗

CWE-264. Open the MITRE definition for the exact weakness description.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.0: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UIRequiredUser interaction: Another user must perform an action for exploitation to succeed.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
UnauthenticatedCWE-264
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1426Google Android: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Google Android ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode mit den Rechten des Dienstes auszuführen, um seine Rechte zu erweitern, um einen Denial of Service Zustand herbeizuführen und um Informationen offenzulegen.

Official advisory ↗
Canadian Centre for Cyber Security · English · AV16-109Android security bulletin – July 2016

744, CVE-2016-3751, CVE-2016-3745, CVE-2016-3746, CVE-2016-3747, CVE-2016-3748, CVE-2016-3749, CVE-2016-3750, CVE-2016-3752, CVE-2016-3753, CVE-2016-2107, CVE-2016-3754, CVE-2016-3755, CVE-2016-3756, CVE-2016-3818, CVE-2014-9794, CVE-2014-9795, CVE-2015-8892, CVE-2013-7457, CVE-2014-9781, CVE-2014-9786, CVE-2014-9788, CVE-2014-9779, CVE-2014-9780, CVE-2014-9789, CVE-2014-9793, CVE-2014-9782, CVE-2014-9783, CVE-2014-9785, CVE-2014-9787, CVE-2014-9784, CVE-2014-9777, CVE-2014-9778, CVE-2014-9790, CVE-2014-9792, CVE-2014-9797, CVE-2014-9791, CVE-2014-9796, CVE-2014-9800, CVE-2014-9799, CVE-2014-9801, CVE-2014-9802, CVE-2015-8891, CVE-2015-8888, CVE-2015-8889, CVE-2015-8890, CVE-2016-2502, CVE-2016-3792, CVE-2016-2501, CVE-2016-3793, CVE-2016-3794, CVE-2016-3795, CVE-2016-3796, CVE-2016-3797, CVE-2016-3798, CVE-2016-3799, CVE-2016-3800, CVE-2016-3801, CVE-2016-3802, CVE-2016-3803, CVE-2016-3804, CVE-2016-3805, CVE-2016-3806, CVE-2016-3807, CVE-2016-3808, CVE-2016-2068, CVE-2014-9803, CVE-2016-3809, CVE-2016-3810, CVE-2016-3757, CVE-2016-3758, CVE-2016-3759, CVE-2016-3760, CVE-2016-3761, CVE-2016-3762, CVE-2016-3763, CVE-2016-3764, CVE-2016-3765, CVE-2016-3766, CVE-2016-3811, CVE-2016-3812, CVE-2016-3813, CVE-2016-3814, CVE-2016-3815, CVE-2016-3816, CVE-2016-0723, CVE-2014-9798, CVE-2015-8893 Sugg

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2016-AVI-227Multiples vulnérabilités dans Google Android (Nexus)

.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-9797 Référence CVE CVE-2014-9798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-9798 Référence CVE CVE-2014-9799 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-9799 Référence CVE CVE-2014-9800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-9800 Référence CVE CVE-2014-9801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-9801 Référence CVE CVE-2014-9802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-9802 Référence CVE CVE-2014-9803 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-9803 Référence CVE CVE-2015-8816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-8816 Référence CVE CVE-2015-8888 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-8888 Référence CVE CVE-2015-8889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-8889 Référence CVE CVE-2015-8890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-8890 Référence CVE CVE-2015-8891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-8891 Référence CVE CVE-2015-8892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-8892 Référence CVE CVE-2015-8893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-8893 Référence CVE CVE-2016-0723 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-0723 Référence CVE CVE-2016-2067 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-2067 Référence CVE CVE-2016-2068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-2068 Référence CVE CVE-2016-2107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-2107 Ré

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2016-003542Nexus 6P デバイス上で稼動する Android の Qualcomm コンポーネントの aboot の実装における脆弱性

Nexus 6P デバイス上で稼動する Android の Qualcomm コンポーネントの aboot の実装は、PIN のリカバリ機能を省略しているため、不特定の影響および攻撃を受ける脆弱性が存在します。 ベンダは、本脆弱性を Android internal bug 28822677 および Qualcomm internal bug CR804067 として公開しています。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Mitigation available
Affected
n/a
Fixed
No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
Action
CCIRC recommends that system administrators look with their respected Android phone vendor and carrier when the update will be available and test and deploy the vendor-released updates to affected applications accordingly. References: Android web site: http://source.android.com/security/bulletin/2016-07-01.html
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 11 Jul 2016 · Last source change 6 Aug 2024, 08:29 UTC · CWE-264

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-09-01
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2015-8745
Product sourceUnavailable
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. ENISA EUVD mappingEUVD-2015-8745 was added to the official ENISA EUVD mapping for this CVE.
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    {"euvdId":"EUVD-2015-8745"}
    ENISA EUVD ↗
  2. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed: added vendor advisory: source.android.com/2016-07-01.html.
    Before
    no authoritative guidance recorded
    After
    vendor advisory: source.android.com/2016-07-01.html
    source.android.com ↗
  3. SeveritySeverity changed from Unknown to High.
    Before
    Unknown
    After
    High
    NIST NVD ↗
  4. CVSS scoreCVSS score changed from not recorded to 7.8 (CVSS 3.0 · NIST NVD · CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    7.8 (CVSS 3.0 · NIST NVD · CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H)
    NIST NVD ↗
  5. Catalogue recordCVE added to the BlackTree catalogue.
    CNA ↗
  6. Remediation statusRemediation status changed from Awaiting fix to Mitigation available.
    Before
    Awaiting fix
    After
    Mitigation available
    Canadian Centre for Cyber Security ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2015-8889 · cve.blacktree.nl