BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2015
CVE-2015-6563High confidence

Affected product: Improper Input Validation

Unknown · Unknown

6.4MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Scheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Fix not verified
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 27 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.38% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Unknown Unknown and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Recheck the vendor advisory before scheduling a change because no verified fixed version is currently retained.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

4 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourceopensshVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:6.9p1-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 22 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourceopensshVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:6.9p1-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 22 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourceopensshVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:6.9p1-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 22 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourceopensshVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:6.9p1-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 22 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2015-6502

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Fix not verified
01

What, why and how

The monitor component in sshd in OpenSSH before 7.0 on non-OpenBSD platforms accepts extraneous username data in MONITOR_REQ_PAM_INIT_CTX requests, which allows local users to conduct impersonation attacks by leveraging any SSH login access in conjunction with control of the sshd uid to send a crafted MONITOR_REQ_PWNAM request, related to monitor.c and monitor_wrap.c.

What

The monitor component in sshd in OpenSSH before 7.0 on non-OpenBSD platforms accepts extraneous username data in MONITOR_REQ_PAM_INIT_CTX requests, which allows local users to conduct impersonation attacks by leveraging any SSH login access in conjunction with control of the sshd uid to send a crafted MONITOR_REQ_PWNAM request, related to monitor.c and monitor_wrap.c.

Why

The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with elevated privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

The monitor component in sshd in OpenSSH before 7.0 on non-OpenBSD platforms accepts extraneous username data in MONITOR_REQ_PAM_INIT_CTX requests, which allows local users to conduct impersonation attacks by leveraging any SSH login access in conjunction with control of the sshd uid to send a crafted MONITOR_REQ_PWNAM request, related to monitor.c and monitor_wrap.c.

Why

The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with elevated privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Improper Input Validation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
High: elevated access is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-20 ↗

CWE-20: Improper Input Validation. The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.PRHighPrivileges required: The attacker needs elevated or administrative privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-20
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

Canadian Centre for Cyber Security · English · AV18-011Juniper Networks security bulletins

d 16.1R5 Junos OS versions 16.1 prior to 16.1R5-S1, 16.1R6 Junos OS versions 16.1 prior to 16.1R6 on MX series Junos OS versions 16.1X65 prior to 16.1X65-D45 Junos OS versions 16.2 prior to 16.2R2, 16.2R2-S2, 16.2R3 Junos OS versions 16.2 prior to 16.2R3 on MX series Junos OS versions 17.1 prior to 17.1R2-S5, 17.1R3 and 17.1R3 on MX series Junos OS versions 17.2X75 prior to 17.2X75-D50 CTPView versions 7.1, 7.2 and 7.3. Junos Space prior to 17.2R1 Security Director and Log Collector prior to 17.2R1 ScreenOS all versions without the latest security patch CVE Reference: CVE-2015-5174, CVE-2015-5188, CVE-2015-5220, CVE-2015-5304, CVE-2015-5600, CVE-2015-6563, CVE-2015-6564, CVE-2015-7236, CVE-2015-7501, CVE-2016-2141, CVE-2016-8655, CVE-2016-8743, CVE-2016-8858, CVE-2017-1000111, CVE-2017-1000112, CVE-2017-14106, CVE-2017-2634, CVE-2017-3167, CVE-2017-3169, CVE-2017-5645, CVE-2017-5664, CVE-2017-6074, CVE-2017-7668, CVE-2017-7679, CVE-2017-9788, CVE-2017-9798, CVE-2018-0001, CVE-2018-0002, CVE-2018-0003, CVE-2018-0004, CVE-2018-0005, CVE-2018-0006, CVE-2018-0007, CVE-2018-0008, CVE-2018-0009, CVE-2018-0010, CVE-2018-0011, CVE-2018-0012, CVE-2018-0013, CVE-2018-0014 Suggested action CCIRC recommends that system administrators test and deploy the vendor released updates on affected platforms accor

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-1094Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-1794 Référence CVE CVE-2015-3193 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-3193 Référence CVE CVE-2015-3194 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-3194 Référence CVE CVE-2015-3195 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-3195 Référence CVE CVE-2015-3196 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-3196 Référence CVE CVE-2015-3197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-3197 Référence CVE CVE-2015-4000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-4000 Référence CVE CVE-2015-5352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-5352 Référence CVE CVE-2015-5600 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-5600 Référence CVE CVE-2015-6563 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-6563 Référence CVE CVE-2015-6564 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-6564 Référence CVE CVE-2015-6565 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-6565 Référence CVE CVE-2015-6574 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-6574 Référence CVE CVE-2015-8325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-8325 Référence CVE CVE-2016-0701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-0701 Référence CVE CVE-2016-0702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-0702 Référence CVE CVE-2016-0703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-0703 Référence CVE CVE-2016-0704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-0704 Ré

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2018-AVI-026Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Juniper

per JSA10840 du 10 janvier 2018 https://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10840&cat=SIRT_1&actp=LIST Bulletin de sécurité Juniper JSA10841 du 10 janvier 2018 https://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10841&cat=SIRT_1&actp=LIST Référence CVE CVE-2015-5174 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-5174 Référence CVE CVE-2015-5188 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-5188 Référence CVE CVE-2015-5220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-5220 Référence CVE CVE-2015-5304 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-5304 Référence CVE CVE-2015-5600 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-5600 Référence CVE CVE-2015-6563 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-6563 Référence CVE CVE-2015-6564 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-6564 Référence CVE CVE-2015-7236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-7236 Référence CVE CVE-2015-7501 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-7501 Référence CVE CVE-2016-2141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-2141 Référence CVE CVE-2016-8655 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-8655 Référence CVE CVE-2016-8743 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-8743 Référence CVE CVE-2016-8858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-8858 Référence CVE CVE-2017-1000111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-1000

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2017-AVI-022Multiples vulnérabilités dans Juniper Network and Security Manager

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été corrigées dans Juniper Network and Security Manager . Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, un déni de service à distance et un déni de service.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2017-AVI-012Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Juniper

du 11 janvier 2017 https://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10773&cat=SIRT_1&actp=LIST Bulletin de sécurité les produits Juniper JSA10774 du 11 janvier 2017 https://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10774&cat=SIRT_1&actp=LIST Référence CVE CVE-2015-5307 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-5307 Référence CVE CVE-2015-5352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-5352 Référence CVE CVE-2015-5364 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-5364 Référence CVE CVE-2015-5366 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-5366 Référence CVE CVE-2015-5600 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-5600 Référence CVE CVE-2015-6563 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-6563 Référence CVE CVE-2015-6564 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-6564 Référence CVE CVE-2015-6565 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-6565 Référence CVE CVE-2015-8104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-8104 Référence CVE CVE-2015-8325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-8325 Référence CVE CVE-2016-0777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-0777 Référence CVE CVE-2016-0778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-0778 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1762 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1762 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1833 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1833 Ré

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2015-AVI-453Multiples vulnérabilités dans Apple OSX

.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-5936 Référence CVE CVE-2015-5937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-5937 Référence CVE CVE-2015-5938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-5938 Référence CVE CVE-2015-5939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-5939 Référence CVE CVE-2015-5940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-5940 Référence CVE CVE-2015-5942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-5942 Référence CVE CVE-2015-5943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-5943 Référence CVE CVE-2015-5944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-5944 Référence CVE CVE-2015-5945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-5945 Référence CVE CVE-2015-6563 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-6563 Référence CVE CVE-2015-6834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-6834 Référence CVE CVE-2015-6835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-6835 Référence CVE CVE-2015-6836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-6836 Référence CVE CVE-2015-6837 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-6837 Référence CVE CVE-2015-6838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-6838 Référence CVE CVE-2015-6974 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-6974 Référence CVE CVE-2015-6975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-6975 Référence CVE CVE-2015-6976 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-6976 Ré

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2015-004403OpenBSD 以外のプラットフォーム上で稼働する OpenSSH の sshd のモニターコンポーネントにおけるなりすまし攻撃を実行される脆弱性

OpenBSD 以外のプラットフォーム上で稼働する OpenSSH の sshd のモニターコンポーネントは、MONITOR_REQ_PAM_INIT_CTX リクエストに外部からのユーザ名データを受け入れるため、なりすまし攻撃を実行される脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix not verified
Affected
n/a
Fixed
No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
Action
No verified patch reference is present in the current structured sources. Check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
Official vendor articles1 stored document

Linked articles are downloaded and versioned as source evidence. A CVE mention or approved update relationship does not, by itself, verify a fix for every product branch.

04

Evidence and provenance

Published 24 Aug 2015 · Last source change 27 May 2026, 16:11 UTC · CWE-20 · Improper Input Validation

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCISA ADP
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-09-01
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2015-6502
Product sourceUnavailable
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCISA ADP
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. ENISA EUVD mappingEUVD-2015-6502 was added to the official ENISA EUVD mapping for this CVE.
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    {"euvdId":"EUVD-2015-6502"}
    ENISA EUVD ↗
  2. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed: added vendor advisory: openssh.com/release-7.0; removed vendor advisory: lists.apple.com/msg00005.html; removed vendor advisory: lists.fedoraproject.org/165170.html; 3 further removals.
    Before
    vendor advisory: lists.apple.com/msg00005.html · vendor advisory: lists.fedoraproject.org/165170.html · vendor advisory: lists.opensuse.org/msg00017.html · 2 more references
    After
    vendor advisory: openssh.com/release-7.0
    openssh.com ↗
  3. Catalogue recordCVE added to the BlackTree catalogue.
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2015-6563 · cve.blacktree.nl