BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2015
CVE-2015-2472High confidence

n/a: Improper Input Validation

n/a · n/a

4.3MediumCVSS 2.0
Recommended action
Scheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2015-2565

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

Remote Desktop Session Host (RDSH) in Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) through 8.1 in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, and Windows RT Gold and 8.1 does not properly verify certificates, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof clients via a crafted certificate with valid Issuer and Serial Number fields, aka "Remote Desktop Session Host Spoofing Vulnerability."

What

Remote Desktop Session Host (RDSH) in Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) through 8.1 in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, and Windows RT Gold and 8.1 does not properly verify certificates, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof clients via a crafted certificate with valid Issuer and Serial Number fields, aka "Remote Desktop Session Host Spoofing Vulnerability."

Why

The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.

How

An attacker operating through the affected interface may attempt exploitation when the stated preconditions are met. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

Remote Desktop Session Host (RDSH) in Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) through 8.1 in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, and Windows RT Gold and 8.1 does not properly verify certificates, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof clients via a crafted certificate with valid Issuer and Serial Number fields, aka "Remote Desktop Session Host Spoofing Vulnerability."

Why

The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.

How

An attacker operating through the affected interface may attempt exploitation when the stated preconditions are met. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
the affected interface → Improper Input Validation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Unspecified
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
Not stated in the selected CVSS metric
Attack complexity
Not stated in the selected CVSS metric
Security boundary
Not stated in the selected CVSS metric
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-20 ↗

CWE-20: Improper Input Validation. The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
UnauthenticatedCWE-20
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2015-AVI-336Multiples vulnérabilités dans le protocole RDP de Microsoft Windows

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été corrigées dans le protocole RDP de Microsoft Windows . Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance et un contournement de la politique de sécurité.

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2015-004138複数の Microsoft Windows 製品のリモート デスクトップ プロトコルにおけるクライアントになりすまされる脆弱性

複数の Microsoft Windows 製品のリモート デスクトップ プロトコル (RDP) のリモート デスクトップ セッション ホスト (RDSH) は、証明書を適切に検証しないため、クライアントになりすまされる脆弱性が存在します。 マイクロソフトセキュリティ情報には、この脆弱性は「リモート デスクトップ セッション ホストのなりすましの脆弱性」と記載されています。

Official advisory ↗
KISA KrCERT/CC · Korean · KNVD-4549MS 8월 보안위협에 따른 정기 보안 업데이트 권고

격코드가 실행될 수 있는 취약점이 존재 o 관련취약점 : - 다중 MS 오피스 메모리 손상 취약점 - (CVE-2015-1642, 2467~2469,2477) - 안전하지 않은 명령 파라미터 통과 취약점 - (CVE-2015-2423) - MS 오피스 원격코드 실행 취약점 - (CVE-2015-2466) - MS 오피스 Integer Underflow 취약점 - (CVE-2015-2470) o 영향 : 원격코드 실행 o 중요도 : 긴급 ##### □ 해당시스템 o 참조사이트 참고 - 한글 : https://technet.microsoft.com/ko-kr/library/security/MS15-081 - 영문 : https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/security/MS15-081 ##### □ 해결책 o 해당 시스템에 대한 마이크로소프트사의 취약점 패치 적용 [MS15-082] 원격 데스크톱 프로토콜 취약점으로 인한 원격코드 실행 문제 ##### □ 영향 o 공격자가 영향 받는 시스템에 원격코드 실행 ##### □ 설명 o 사용자가 특수하게 제작된 DLL 파일을 실행할 때, 원격코드가 실행될 수 있는 취약점이 존재 o 관련취약점 : - Remote Desktop Session 호스트 스푸핑 취약점 ? (CVE-2015-2472) - Remote Desktop Protocol(RDP) DLL 원격코드 실행 취약점 ? (CVE-2015-2473) o 영향 : 원격코드 실행 o 중요도 : 중요 ##### □ 해당시스템 o 참조사이트 참고 - 한글 : https://technet.microsoft.com/ko-kr/library/security/MS15-082 - 영문 : https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/security/MS15-082 ##### □ 해결책 o 해당 시스템에 대한 마이크로소프트사의 취약점 패치 적용 [MS15-083] Server Message Block의 취약점으로 인한 원격코드 실행 문제 ##### □ 영향 o 공격자가 영향 받는 시스템에 원격코드 실행 ##### □ 설명 o 공격자가 SMB 서버에 특수하게 제작된 String를 전송할 경우, 원격코드가 실행될 수 있는 취약점이 존재 o 관련취약점 : - SMB 메모리 손상 취약점 ? (CVE-2015-2474) o 영향 : 원격코드 실행 o 중요도 : 중요 ##### □ 해당시스템 o 참조사이트 참고 - 한글 : https://technet.microsoft.com/ko-kr/library/security/MS15-083 - 영문 : https://techn

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
n/a: n/a
Fixed
An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 15 Aug 2015 · Last source change 6 Aug 2024, 05:17 UTC · CWE-20 · Improper Input Validation

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-09-01
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2015-2565
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. SeveritySeverity changed from Unknown to Medium.
    Before
    Unknown
    After
    Medium
    NIST NVD ↗
  2. CVSS scoreCVSS score changed from not recorded to 4.3 (CVSS 2.0 · NIST NVD · AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N).
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    4.3 (CVSS 2.0 · NIST NVD · AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N)
    NIST NVD ↗
  3. ENISA EUVD mappingEUVD-2015-2565 was added to the official ENISA EUVD mapping for this CVE.
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    {"euvdId":"EUVD-2015-2565"}
    ENISA EUVD ↗
  4. Catalogue recordCVE added to the BlackTree catalogue.
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Fixed release or patch reference recorded
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2015-2565↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2015-2472 · cve.blacktree.nl