Evidence used
- No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
- EPSS is 3.16% for the current model date.
BlackTreeCVE IntelligenceRed Hat · OpenStack Folsom for RHEL 6
Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.
Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.
A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.
| Distribution release | Source package | Vendor state | Fixed version | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debian trixietrixie · source | keystone | Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release. | 2013.1.1-2 | Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 8 Oct 2026 |
| Debian bookwormbookworm · source | keystone | Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release. | 2013.1.1-2 | Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 8 Oct 2026 |
| Debian forkyforky · source | keystone | Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release. | 2013.1.1-2 | Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 8 Oct 2026 |
| Debian sidsid · source | keystone | Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release. | 2013.1.1-2 | Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 8 Oct 2026 |
These OSV and GitHub advisory ranges apply only to the named package and ecosystem. A listed fixed version is not a universal product patch or proof that an update is installed.
| Ecosystem and package | Affected range | First fixed version | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| pipkeystone | < 8.0.0a0 | 8.0.0a0 | GitHub advisory ↗github reviewed aggregator · 7 Apr 2026 |
Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.
Patch availableA flaw was found in OpenStack Keystone. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a large HTTP request, specifically by providing a long tenant name when requesting a token. This could lead to a denial of service, consuming excessive CPU and memory resources on the affected system.
A flaw was found in OpenStack Keystone. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a large HTTP request, specifically by providing a long tenant name when requesting a token. This could lead to a denial of service, consuming excessive CPU and memory resources on the affected system.
The product receives input that is expected to specify a quantity (such as size or length), but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the quantity has the required properties.
An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.
A flaw was found in OpenStack Keystone. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a large HTTP request, specifically by providing a long tenant name when requesting a token. This could lead to a denial of service, consuming excessive CPU and memory resources on the affected system.
The product receives input that is expected to specify a quantity (such as size or length), but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the quantity has the required properties.
An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.
CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.
No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.
No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.
CWE-1284: Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input. The product receives input that is expected to specify a quantity (such as size or length), but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the quantity has the required properties.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HCommon Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.
Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.
Published 12 Apr 2013 · Last source change 30 Jul 2026, 13:39 UTC · CWE-1284 · Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input
Missing structured fields: affected versions. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.