Evidence used
- No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
- A structured source references public exploit or proof-of-concept material.
- EPSS is 0.95% for the current model date.
BlackTreeCVE IntelligenceUnknown · Unknown
Low technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.
Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.
A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.
| Distribution release | Source package | Vendor state | Fixed version | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debian trixietrixie · source | linux | Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release. | 3.2.29-1 | Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 4 Oct 2026 |
| Debian bookwormbookworm · source | linux | Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release. | 3.2.29-1 | Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 4 Oct 2026 |
| Debian forkyforky · source | linux | Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release. | 3.2.29-1 | Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 4 Oct 2026 |
| Debian sidsid · source | linux | Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release. | 3.2.29-1 | Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 4 Oct 2026 |
Low technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.
Fix not verifiedThe rds_recvmsg function in net/rds/recv.c in the Linux kernel before 3.0.44 does not initialize a certain structure member, which allows local users to obtain potentially sensitive information from kernel stack memory via a (1) recvfrom or (2) recvmsg system call on an RDS socket.
The rds_recvmsg function in net/rds/recv.c in the Linux kernel before 3.0.44 does not initialize a certain structure member, which allows local users to obtain potentially sensitive information from kernel stack memory via a (1) recvfrom or (2) recvmsg system call on an RDS socket.
The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.
An attacker operating through the affected interface may attempt exploitation when the stated preconditions are met. If successful, the issue may obtain information outside the intended access boundary.
The rds_recvmsg function in net/rds/recv.c in the Linux kernel before 3.0.44 does not initialize a certain structure member, which allows local users to obtain potentially sensitive information from kernel stack memory via a (1) recvfrom or (2) recvmsg system call on an RDS socket.
The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.
An attacker operating through the affected interface may attempt exploitation when the stated preconditions are met. If successful, the issue may obtain information outside the intended access boundary.
CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.
No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.
A structured CVE source labels at least one public reference as exploit material. BlackTree has not independently validated that it is safe, reliable or weaponised.
CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor. The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.
AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:NOperational remediation based on structured source evidence.
Published 3 Oct 2012 · Last source change 6 Aug 2024, 20:05 UTC · CWE-200 · Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
Missing structured fields: affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.