Evidence used
- No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
- The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
- EPSS is 2.97% for the current model date.
BlackTreeCVE IntelligenceUnknown · Unknown
High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.
Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.
A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.
| Distribution release | Source package | Vendor state | Fixed version | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debian trixietrixie · source | cups | Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release. | 1.1.18-1 | Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 4 Oct 2026 |
| Debian bookwormbookworm · source | cups | Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release. | 1.1.18-1 | Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 4 Oct 2026 |
| Debian forkyforky · source | cups | Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release. | 1.1.18-1 | Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 4 Oct 2026 |
| Debian sidsid · source | cups | Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release. | 1.1.18-1 | Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 4 Oct 2026 |
High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.
Fix not verifiedCommon Unix Printing System (CUPS) 1.1.14 through 1.1.17 does not properly check the return values of various file and socket operations, which could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service (resource exhaustion) by causing file descriptors to be assigned and not released, as demonstrated by fanta.
Common Unix Printing System (CUPS) 1.1.14 through 1.1.17 does not properly check the return values of various file and socket operations, which could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service (resource exhaustion) by causing file descriptors to be assigned and not released, as demonstrated by fanta.
The product does not check the return value from a method or function, which can prevent it from detecting unexpected states and conditions.
An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.
Common Unix Printing System (CUPS) 1.1.14 through 1.1.17 does not properly check the return values of various file and socket operations, which could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service (resource exhaustion) by causing file descriptors to be assigned and not released, as demonstrated by fanta.
The product does not check the return value from a method or function, which can prevent it from detecting unexpected states and conditions.
An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.
CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.
No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.
No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.
CWE-252: Unchecked Return Value. The product does not check the return value from a method or function, which can prevent it from detecting unexpected states and conditions.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HCommon Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.
Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.
Published 1 Sept 2004 · Last source change 16 Jan 2025, 17:42 UTC · CWE-252 · Unchecked Return Value
Missing structured fields: affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.