BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-72046High confidence

gve: fix header buffer corruption with header-split and HW-GRO

Linux · Linux

9.8CriticalCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 89 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityCriticalOperational priority:Critical, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.67% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 3 daysRemediation target: Within 90 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 89 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

18 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 13 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.101-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinux-6.12Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.101-1~deb12u1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.1.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.1.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-aws-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fde-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidia-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatency-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracle-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
CVE-2026-72046 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 11 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2026-72046
78 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • kernel-default-extra as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • dlm-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • gfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • ocfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 16.0
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 16.0
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 16.1
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: gve: fix header buffer corruption with header-split and HW-GRO The DQO RX datapath programs a per-buffer-queue-descriptor header_buf_addr at post time and reads the split header back at completion time. Both the post and the read currently index the header buffer by queue position rather than by the buffer's identity: - post (gve_rx_post_buffers_dqo): header_buf_addr is computed from bufq->tail - read (gve_rx_dqo): the header is read from desc_idx (the completion queue head index) This relies on the buffer-queue index and the completion-queue index being equal for the start of every packet, i.e. on the device consuming posted buffers and returning completions in the exact same order. That assumption does not hold once HW-GRO is enabled with multiple flows: coalesced segments are accepted and completed in an order that may differ from the order buffers were posted, and segments from different flows may interleave. That results in two problems: 1. Wrong header slot on read. Because the read offset is derived from the completion index (desc_idx) while the device wrote the header to the address programmed for the buffer's buf_id, the driver can copy a header belonging to a different packet. This shows up as throughput drop (about 30% drop and large numbers of TCP retransmissions) with header-split and HW-GRO both enabled and many streams. 2. Header buffer reused while still owned by the device. The driver advances bufq->head by one per completion and re-posts buffers based on that. Arrival of N RX completions only guarantees that at least N RX buffer descriptors have been read by the device. It does not guarantee that the device has relinquished the ownership of all the buffers corresponding to those N descriptors. With out-of-order completions (e.g. the completion for a packet copied into buffer N arrives before the completion for a packet copied into buffer N-1), the driver can re-post and overwrite a header buffer that the device is still going to write into, corrupting the header of a packet whose completion has not yet been processed. Fix both issues by indexing the header buffer by buf_id on both the post and read paths. Reading from buf_id's slot is therefore always correct regardless of completion ordering (fixes problem 1). Indexing by buf_id also ties each header slot to the lifetime of its buffer state. A buffer state is only returned to the free/recycle lists when its own completion (buf_id) is processed, so its header slot can only be re-posted after the device is done with it. This makes header slot reuse safe under out-of-order completions (fixes problem 2). Allocate (gve_rx_alloc_hdr_bufs) and free (gve_rx_free_hdr_bufs) the header buffers based on num_buf_states to match the buf_id indexing.
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
CVE-2026-72046 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitykernel: gve: fix header buffer corruption with header-split and HW-GRO
76 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-devel-matched as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules-extra as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-devel-matched as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
Summary
A flaw was found in the Linux kernel's gve driver. When the header-split and Hardware-assisted Generic Receive Offload (HW-GRO) features are active, the driver incorrectly indexes network packet header buffers. This can lead to the driver reading headers belonging to different packets or overwriting header buffers still in use by the device. The primary impact is data corruption, which can cause a significant reduction in network throughput and increased TCP retransmissions, potentially resulting in a denial of service.
Remediation
Affected
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-59004

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 89 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: gve: fix header buffer corruption with header-split and HW-GRO The DQO RX datapath programs a per-buffer-queue-descriptor header_buf_addr at post time and reads the split header back at completion time. Both the post and the read currently index the header buffer by queue position rather than by the buffer's identity: - post (gve_rx_post_buffers_dqo): header_buf_addr is computed from bufq->tail - read (gve_rx_dqo): the header is read from desc_idx (the completion queue head index) This relies on the buffer-queue index and the completion-queue index being equal for the start of every packet, i.e. on the device consuming posted buffers and returning completions in the exact same order. That assumption does not hold once HW-GRO is enabled with multiple flows: coalesced segments are accepted and completed in an order that may differ from the order buffers were posted, and segments from different flows may interleave. That results in two problems: 1. Wrong header slot on read. Because the read offset is derived from the completion index (desc_idx) while the device wrote the header to the address programmed for the buffer's buf_id, the driver can copy a header belonging to a different packet. This shows up as throughput drop (about 30% drop and large numbers of TCP retransmissions) with header-split and HW-GRO both enabled and many streams. 2. Header buffer reused while still owned by the device. The driver advances bufq->head by one per completion and re-posts buffers based on that. Arrival of N RX completions only guarantees that at least N RX buffer descriptors have been read by the device. It does not guarantee that the device has relinquished the ownership of all the buffers corresponding to those N descriptors. With out-of-order completions (e.g. the completion for a packet copied into buffer N arrives before the completion for a packet copied into buffer N-1), the driver can re-post and overwrite a header buffer that the device is still going to write into, corrupting the header of a packet whose completion has not yet been processed. Fix both issues by indexing the header buffer by buf_id on both the post and read paths. Reading from buf_id's slot is therefore always correct regardless of completion ordering (fixes problem 1). Indexing by buf_id also ties each header slot to the lifetime of its buffer state. A buffer state is only returned to the free/recycle lists when its own completion (buf_id) is processed, so its header slot can only be re-posted after the device is done with it. This makes header slot reuse safe under out-of-order completions (fixes problem 2). Allocate (gve_rx_alloc_hdr_bufs) and free (gve_rx_free_hdr_bufs) the header buffers based on num_buf_states to match the buf_id indexing.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: gve: fix header buffer corruption with header-split and HW-GRO The DQO RX datapath programs a per-buffer-queue-descriptor header_buf_addr at post time and reads the split header back at completion time. Both the post and the read currently index the header buffer by queue position rather than by the buffer's identity: - post (gve_rx_post_buffers_dqo): header_buf_addr is computed from bufq->tail - read (gve_rx_dqo): the header is read from desc_idx (the completion queue head index) This relies on the buffer-queue index and the completion-queue index being equal for the start of every packet, i.e. on the device consuming posted buffers and returning completions in the exact same order. That assumption does not hold once HW-GRO is enabled with multiple flows: coalesced segments are accepted and completed in an order that may differ from the order buffers were posted, and segments from different flows may interleave. That results in two problems: 1. Wrong header slot on read. Because the read offset is derived from the completion index (desc_idx) while the device wrote the header to the address programmed for the buffer's buf_id, the driver can copy a header belonging to a different packet. This shows up as throughput drop (about 30% drop and large numbers of TCP retransmissions) with header-split and HW-GRO both enabled and many streams. 2. Header buffer reused while still owned by the device. The driver advances bufq->head by one per completion and re-posts buffers based on that. Arrival of N RX completions only guarantees that at least N RX buffer descriptors have been read by the device. It does not guarantee that the device has relinquished the ownership of all the buffers corresponding to those N descriptors. With out-of-order completions (e.g. the completion for a packet copied into buffer N arrives before the completion for a packet copied into buffer N-1), the driver can re-post and overwrite a header buffer that the device is still going to write into, corrupting the header of a packet whose completion has not yet been processed. Fix both issues by indexing the header buffer by buf_id on both the post and read paths. Reading from buf_id's slot is therefore always correct regardless of completion ordering (fixes problem 1). Indexing by buf_id also ties each header slot to the lifetime of its buffer state. A buffer state is only returned to the free/recycle lists when its own completion (buf_id) is processed, so its header slot can only be re-posted after the device is done with it. This makes header slot reuse safe under out-of-order completions (fixes problem 2). Allocate (gve_rx_alloc_hdr_bufs) and free (gve_rx_free_hdr_bufs) the header buffers based on num_buf_states to match the buf_id indexing.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: gve: fix header buffer corruption with header-split and HW-GRO The DQO RX datapath programs a per-buffer-queue-descriptor header_buf_addr at post time and reads the split header back at completion time. Both the post and the read currently index the header buffer by queue position rather than by the buffer's identity: - post (gve_rx_post_buffers_dqo): header_buf_addr is computed from bufq->tail - read (gve_rx_dqo): the header is read from desc_idx (the completion queue head index) This relies on the buffer-queue index and the completion-queue index being equal for the start of every packet, i.e. on the device consuming posted buffers and returning completions in the exact same order. That assumption does not hold once HW-GRO is enabled with multiple flows: coalesced segments are accepted and completed in an order that may differ from the order buffers were posted, and segments from different flows may interleave. That results in two problems: 1. Wrong header slot on read. Because the read offset is derived from the completion index (desc_idx) while the device wrote the header to the address programmed for the buffer's buf_id, the driver can copy a header belonging to a different packet. This shows up as throughput drop (about 30% drop and large numbers of TCP retransmissions) with header-split and HW-GRO both enabled and many streams. 2. Header buffer reused while still owned by the device. The driver advances bufq->head by one per completion and re-posts buffers based on that. Arrival of N RX completions only guarantees that at least N RX buffer descriptors have been read by the device. It does not guarantee that the device has relinquished the ownership of all the buffers corresponding to those N descriptors. With out-of-order completions (e.g. the completion for a packet copied into buffer N arrives before the completion for a packet copied into buffer N-1), the driver can re-post and overwrite a header buffer that the device is still going to write into, corrupting the header of a packet whose completion has not yet been processed. Fix both issues by indexing the header buffer by buf_id on both the post and read paths. Reading from buf_id's slot is therefore always correct regardless of completion ordering (fixes problem 1). Indexing by buf_id also ties each header slot to the lifetime of its buffer state. A buffer state is only returned to the free/recycle lists when its own completion (buf_id) is processed, so its header slot can only be re-posted after the device is done with it. This makes header slot reuse safe under out-of-order completions (fixes problem 2). Allocate (gve_rx_alloc_hdr_bufs) and free (gve_rx_free_hdr_bufs) the header buffers based on num_buf_states to match the buf_id indexing.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticated
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-2852Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um root Rechte zu erlangen, um einen Denial of Service herbeizuführen oder einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260819Security Bulletin 19 Aug 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 19 Aug 2026, published on 19 August 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1252Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-68459 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68460 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68460 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68461 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68461 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68476 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68477 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68477 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72014 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72020 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72033 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72041 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72046 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72064 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72069 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72084 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72085 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72098 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1255Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-72019 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72020 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72022 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72023 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72032 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72034 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72036 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72045 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72046 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72051 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72052 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72053 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72054 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72055 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72061 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72069 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1229Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-68459 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68460 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68460 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68461 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68461 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68476 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68477 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68477 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72014 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72020 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72033 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72041 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72046 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72064 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72069 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72084 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72085 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72098 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1202Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-68445 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68446 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68446 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68450 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68450 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68470 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68480 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72020 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72032 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72036 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72046 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72069 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72072 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72084 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72123 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72132 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72221 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1164Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-68445 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68446 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68446 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68450 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68450 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68470 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68480 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72020 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72032 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72036 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72046 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72069 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72072 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72084 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72123 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72132 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72221 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1069Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-68449 Référence CVE CVE-2026-68450 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68450 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72015 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72017 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72023 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72030 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72032 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72045 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72046 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72051 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72062 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72069 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72070 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-72113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 6.9, 6.12.101 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.40 ≤ 6.18.*, 7.1.5 ≤ 7.1.*, 7.2 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 15 Aug 2026 · Last source change 17 Aug 2026, 05:39 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-23
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-59004
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD received

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    5e37d8254e7f551dda62e7590e819d69c7491845 < 84d3753d4bf284ef770ead6dee2270aaabb3ef41; 5e37d8254e7f551dda62e7590e819d69c7491845 < 35267819b25074084130b6a7be18bbaf44d3ae74; 5e37d8254e7f551dda62e7590e819d69c7491845 < 9f8e7f59b0c2f466be74bd923726b0f5496c27ad; 5e37d8254e7f551dda62e7590e819d69c7491845 < d676c9a73bdcd8237425dbb826f2bd1a25c36e40; 6.9 · Fixed: < 6.9; 6.12.101 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.18.40 ≤ 6.18.*; 7.1.5 ≤ 7.1.*; 7.2-rc1 ≤ *
    After
    5e37d8254e7f551dda62e7590e819d69c7491845 < 84d3753d4bf284ef770ead6dee2270aaabb3ef41; 5e37d8254e7f551dda62e7590e819d69c7491845 < 35267819b25074084130b6a7be18bbaf44d3ae74; 5e37d8254e7f551dda62e7590e819d69c7491845 < 9f8e7f59b0c2f466be74bd923726b0f5496c27ad; 5e37d8254e7f551dda62e7590e819d69c7491845 < d676c9a73bdcd8237425dbb826f2bd1a25c36e40; 6.9 · Fixed: < 6.9; 6.12.101 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.18.40 ≤ 6.18.*; 7.1.5 ≤ 7.1.*; 7.2 ≤ *
    CNA ↗
  2. SeveritySeverity changed from Unknown to Critical.
    Before
    Unknown
    After
    Critical
    CNA ↗
  3. CVSS scoreCVSS score changed from not recorded to 9.8 (CVSS 3.1 · CNA · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    9.8 (CVSS 3.1 · CNA · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H)
    CNA ↗
  4. Catalogue recordCVE added to the BlackTree catalogue.
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-72046 · cve.blacktree.nl