BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-2391High confidence

qs's arrayLimit bypass in comma parsing allows denial of service

Unknown · Unknown

Official source article: GitHub GHSA-W7FW-MJWX-W883 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

6.3MediumCVSS 4.0
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:High, raised one band.upgradedsince 12 Feb 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • A structured source references public exploit or proof-of-concept material.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.51% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Increase monitoring for the attack path and post-exploitation behaviour described in the report.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Unknown Unknown and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

5 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 2 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcenode-qsAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 8 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcenode-qsAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 8 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcenode-qsVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.15.0+ds+~6.15.0-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 8 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcenode-qsVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.15.0+ds+~6.15.0-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 8 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivenode-qsUnder evaluationCanonical reports that the package might be affected and still needs evaluation or fixing.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Open-source package ranges2 source-attributed ranges

These OSV and GitHub advisory ranges apply only to the named package and ecosystem. A listed fixed version is not a universal product patch or proof that an update is installed.

Ecosystem and packageAffected rangeFirst fixed versionEvidence
npmqs>= 6.7.0, <= 6.14.16.14.2GitHub advisory ↗upstream repository advisory · 12 Feb 2026
npmqsSEMVER: introduced 6.7.0; fixed 6.14.26.14.2OSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-6720

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

### Summary The `arrayLimit` option in qs does not enforce limits for comma-separated values when `comma: true` is enabled, allowing attackers to cause denial-of-service via memory exhaustion. This is a bypass of the array limit enforcement, similar to the bracket notation bypass addressed in GHSA-6rw7-vpxm-498p (CVE-2025-15284). ### Details When the `comma` option is set to `true` (not the default, but configurable in applications), qs allows parsing comma-separated strings as arrays (e.g., `?param=a,b,c` becomes `['a', 'b', 'c']`). However, the limit check for `arrayLimit` (default: 20) and the optional throwOnLimitExceeded occur after the comma-handling logic in `parseArrayValue`, enabling a bypass. This permits creation of arbitrarily large arrays from a single parameter, leading to excessive memory allocation. **Vulnerable code** (lib/parse.js: lines ~40-50): ```js if (val && typeof val === 'string' && options.comma && val.indexOf(',') > -1) {     return val.split(','); } if (options.throwOnLimitExceeded && currentArrayLength >= options.arrayLimit) {     throw new RangeError('Array limit exceeded. Only ' + options.arrayLimit + ' element' + (options.arrayLimit === 1 ? '' : 's') + ' allowed in an array.'); } return val; ``` The `split(',')` returns the array immediately, skipping the subsequent limit check. Downstream merging via `utils.combine` does not prevent allocation, even if it marks overflows for sparse arrays.This discrepancy allows attackers to send a single parameter with millions of commas (e.g., `?param=,,,,,,,,...`), allocating massive arrays in memory without triggering limits. It bypasses the intent of `arrayLimit`, which is enforced correctly for indexed (`a[0]=`) and bracket (`a[]=`) notations (the latter fixed in v6.14.1 per GHSA-6rw7-vpxm-498p). ### PoC **Test 1 - Basic bypass:** ``` npm install qs ``` ```js const qs = require('qs'); const payload = 'a=' + ','.repeat(25); // 26 elements after split (bypasses arrayLimit: 5) const options = { comma: true, arrayLimit: 5, throwOnLimitExceeded: true }; try {   const result = qs.parse(payload, options);   console.log(result.a.length); // Outputs: 26 (bypass successful) } catch (e) {   console.log('Limit enforced:', e.message); // Not thrown } ``` **Configuration:** - `comma: true` - `arrayLimit: 5` - `throwOnLimitExceeded: true` Expected: Throws "Array limit exceeded" error. Actual: Parses successfully, creating an array of length 26. ### Impact Denial of Service (DoS) via memory exhaustion.

What

### Summary The `arrayLimit` option in qs does not enforce limits for comma-separated values when `comma: true` is enabled, allowing attackers to cause denial-of-service via memory exhaustion. This is a bypass of the array limit enforcement, similar to the bracket notation bypass addressed in GHSA-6rw7-vpxm-498p (CVE-2025-15284). ### Details When the `comma` option is set to `true` (not the default, but configurable in applications), qs allows parsing comma-separated strings as arrays (e.g., `?param=a,b,c` becomes `['a', 'b', 'c']`). However, the limit check for `arrayLimit` (default: 20) and the optional throwOnLimitExceeded occur after the comma-handling logic in `parseArrayValue`, enabling a bypass. This permits creation of arbitrarily large arrays from a single parameter, leading to excessive memory allocation. **Vulnerable code** (lib/parse.js: lines ~40-50): ```js if (val && typeof val === 'string' && options.comma && val.indexOf(',') > -1) {     return val.split(','); } if (options.throwOnLimitExceeded && currentArrayLength >= options.arrayLimit) {     throw new RangeError('Array limit exceeded. Only ' + options.arrayLimit + ' element' + (options.arrayLimit === 1 ? '' : 's') + ' allowed in an array.'); } return val; ``` The `split(',')` returns the array immediately, skipping the subsequent limit check. Downstream merging via `utils.combine` does not prevent allocation, even if it marks overflows for sparse arrays.This discrepancy allows attackers to send a single parameter with millions of commas (e.g., `?param=,,,,,,,,...`), allocating massive arrays in memory without triggering limits. It bypasses the intent of `arrayLimit`, which is enforced correctly for indexed (`a[0]=`) and bracket (`a[]=`) notations (the latter fixed in v6.14.1 per GHSA-6rw7-vpxm-498p). ### PoC **Test 1 - Basic bypass:** ``` npm install qs ``` ```js const qs = require('qs'); const payload = 'a=' + ','.repeat(25); // 26 elements after split (bypasses arrayLimit: 5) const options = { comma: true, arrayLimit: 5, throwOnLimitExceeded: true }; try {   const result = qs.parse(payload, options);   console.log(result.a.length); // Outputs: 26 (bypass successful) } catch (e) {   console.log('Limit enforced:', e.message); // Not thrown } ``` **Configuration:** - `comma: true` - `arrayLimit: 5` - `throwOnLimitExceeded: true` Expected: Throws "Array limit exceeded" error. Actual: Parses successfully, creating an array of length 26. ### Impact Denial of Service (DoS) via memory exhaustion.

Why

The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

### Summary The `arrayLimit` option in qs does not enforce limits for comma-separated values when `comma: true` is enabled, allowing attackers to cause denial-of-service via memory exhaustion. This is a bypass of the array limit enforcement, similar to the bracket notation bypass addressed in GHSA-6rw7-vpxm-498p (CVE-2025-15284). ### Details When the `comma` option is set to `true` (not the default, but configurable in applications), qs allows parsing comma-separated strings as arrays (e.g., `?param=a,b,c` becomes `['a', 'b', 'c']`). However, the limit check for `arrayLimit` (default: 20) and the optional throwOnLimitExceeded occur after the comma-handling logic in `parseArrayValue`, enabling a bypass. This permits creation of arbitrarily large arrays from a single parameter, leading to excessive memory allocation. **Vulnerable code** (lib/parse.js: lines ~40-50): ```js if (val && typeof val === 'string' && options.comma && val.indexOf(',') > -1) {     return val.split(','); } if (options.throwOnLimitExceeded && currentArrayLength >= options.arrayLimit) {     throw new RangeError('Array limit exceeded. Only ' + options.arrayLimit + ' element' + (options.arrayLimit === 1 ? '' : 's') + ' allowed in an array.'); } return val; ``` The `split(',')` returns the array immediately, skipping the subsequent limit check. Downstream merging via `utils.combine` does not prevent allocation, even if it marks overflows for sparse arrays.This discrepancy allows attackers to send a single parameter with millions of commas (e.g., `?param=,,,,,,,,...`), allocating massive arrays in memory without triggering limits. It bypasses the intent of `arrayLimit`, which is enforced correctly for indexed (`a[0]=`) and bracket (`a[]=`) notations (the latter fixed in v6.14.1 per GHSA-6rw7-vpxm-498p). ### PoC **Test 1 - Basic bypass:** ``` npm install qs ``` ```js const qs = require('qs'); const payload = 'a=' + ','.repeat(25); // 26 elements after split (bypasses arrayLimit: 5) const options = { comma: true, arrayLimit: 5, throwOnLimitExceeded: true }; try {   const result = qs.parse(payload, options);   console.log(result.a.length); // Outputs: 26 (bypass successful) } catch (e) {   console.log('Limit enforced:', e.message); // Not thrown } ``` **Configuration:** - `comma: true` - `arrayLimit: 5` - `throwOnLimitExceeded: true` Expected: Throws "Array limit exceeded" error. Actual: Parses successfully, creating an array of length 26. ### Impact Denial of Service (DoS) via memory exhaustion.

Why

The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
Reference recorded

A structured CVE source labels at least one public reference as exploit material. BlackTree has not independently validated that it is safe, reliable or weaponised.

Likely attack path
a network path → Improper Input Validation → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Not a CVSS 4.0 base metric
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-20 ↗

CWE-20: Improper Input Validation. The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 4.0: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.ATPresentAttack requirements: A particular deployment or execution condition must be present.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.VCNoneVulnerable-system confidentiality: No direct loss is represented by this metric.VINoneVulnerable-system integrity: No direct loss is represented by this metric.VALowVulnerable-system availability: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.SCNoneSubsequent-system confidentiality: No direct loss is represented by this metric.SINoneSubsequent-system integrity: No direct loss is represented by this metric.SANoneSubsequent-system availability: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedDenial of serviceCWE-20Public exploit reference
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-3623IBM DataPower Gateway: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM DataPower Gateway ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, erweiterte Berechtigungen zu erlangen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, Daten zu manipulieren oder offenzulegen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand auszulösen oder Cross-Site-Scripting-Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-3596IBM App Connect Enterprise: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM App Connect Enterprise ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen, um Informationen offenzulegen, um Dateien zu manipulieren und um einen Cross-Site Scripting Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-3046IBM Concert: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM Concert ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen, um Informationen offenzulegen, um Dateien zu manipulieren, um einen Cross-Site Scripting Angriff durchzuführen, um einen SQL-Injection Angriff durchzuführen und um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-2933Splunk SOAR: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Splunk SOAR ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen, um Informationen offenzulegen, um Dateien zu manipulieren, um einen SQL-Injection Angriff durchzuführen, um einen Cross-Site Scripting Angriff durchzuführen, und um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260218Security Bulletin 18 Feb 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 18 Feb 2026, published on 18 February 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1256Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ecord?id=CVE-2026-17523 Référence CVE CVE-2026-18401 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-18401 Référence CVE CVE-2026-18446 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-18446 Référence CVE CVE-2026-18525 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-18525 Référence CVE CVE-2026-2327 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2327 Référence CVE CVE-2026-2359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2359 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23745 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23745 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23901 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23903 Référence CVE CVE-2026-2391 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2391 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23950 Référence CVE CVE-2026-24842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24842 Référence CVE CVE-2026-25639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25639 Référence CVE CVE-2026-26960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26960 Référence CVE CVE-2026-26996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26996 Référence CVE CVE-2026-27903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27903 Référence CVE CVE-2026-27904 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27904 Référence CVE CVE-2026-27980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=C

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1233Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2026-16440 Référence CVE CVE-2026-16441 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-16441 Référence CVE CVE-2026-16728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-16728 Référence CVE CVE-2026-16729 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-16729 Référence CVE CVE-2026-18149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-18149 Référence CVE CVE-2026-18446 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-18446 Référence CVE CVE-2026-18540 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-18540 Référence CVE CVE-2026-19534 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-19534 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22701 Référence CVE CVE-2026-2391 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2391 Référence CVE CVE-2026-25793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25793 Référence CVE CVE-2026-33891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-33891 Référence CVE CVE-2026-33894 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-33894 Référence CVE CVE-2026-33895 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-33895 Référence CVE CVE-2026-33896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-33896 Référence CVE CVE-2026-34043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-34043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-3449 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3449 Référence CVE CVE-2026-41254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1056Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Splunk

/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1312 Référence CVE CVE-2026-1642 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1642 Référence CVE CVE-2026-2004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2004 Référence CVE CVE-2026-2005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2005 Référence CVE CVE-2026-2006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2006 Référence CVE CVE-2026-21226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21226 Référence CVE CVE-2026-21860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21860 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22702 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22815 Référence CVE CVE-2026-2391 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2391 Référence CVE CVE-2026-24001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24001 Référence CVE CVE-2026-24040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-24043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-24133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24133 Référence CVE CVE-2026-24737 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24737 Référence CVE CVE-2026-25535 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25535 Référence CVE CVE-2026-25673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25673 Référence CVE CVE-2026-25674 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=C

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0958Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ERecord?id=CVE-2026-22018 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22021 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22752 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22795 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22796 Référence CVE CVE-2026-2303 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2303 Référence CVE CVE-2026-2332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2332 Référence CVE CVE-2026-2359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2359 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23745 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23745 Référence CVE CVE-2026-2391 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2391 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23950 Référence CVE CVE-2026-2482 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2482 Référence CVE CVE-2026-24842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24842 Référence CVE CVE-2026-24880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24880 Référence CVE CVE-2026-25639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25639 Référence CVE CVE-2026-25680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25680 Référence CVE CVE-2026-25681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25681 Référence CVE CVE-2026-25854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0901Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ecord?id=CVE-2026-22021 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22029 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22029 Référence CVE CVE-2026-2332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2332 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23479 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23479 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23490 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23490 Référence CVE CVE-2026-2359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2359 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23631 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23631 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23745 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23745 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23865 Référence CVE CVE-2026-2391 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2391 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23950 Référence CVE CVE-2026-24051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24051 Référence CVE CVE-2026-24842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24842 Référence CVE CVE-2026-2492 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2492 Référence CVE CVE-2026-25243 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25243 Référence CVE CVE-2026-25589 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25589 Référence CVE CVE-2026-25639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25639 Référence CVE CVE-2026-25645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0834Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-11708 Référence CVE CVE-2026-11712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-11712 Référence CVE CVE-2026-11714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-11714 Référence CVE CVE-2026-1352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1352 Référence CVE CVE-2026-13772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-13772 Référence CVE CVE-2026-1577 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1577 Référence CVE CVE-2026-1718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1718 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22029 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22029 Référence CVE CVE-2026-2327 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2327 Référence CVE CVE-2026-2391 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2391 Référence CVE CVE-2026-24001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24001 Référence CVE CVE-2026-24040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-24043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-24133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24133 Référence CVE CVE-2026-24737 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24737 Référence CVE CVE-2026-25535 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25535 Référence CVE CVE-2026-25639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25639 Référence CVE CVE-2026-25755 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=C

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0641Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2026-21933 Référence CVE CVE-2026-21945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21945 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22007 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22008 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22008 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22013 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22016 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22018 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22021 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23865 Référence CVE CVE-2026-2391 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2391 Référence CVE CVE-2026-24281 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24281 Référence CVE CVE-2026-25639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25639 Référence CVE CVE-2026-25679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25679 Référence CVE CVE-2026-26007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26007 Référence CVE CVE-2026-26996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26996 Référence CVE CVE-2026-27142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27142 Référence CVE CVE-2026-27903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27903 Référence CVE CVE-2026-27904 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=C

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0523Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ord?id=CVE-2025-66035 Référence CVE CVE-2025-66412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66412 Référence CVE CVE-2025-67030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-67030 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68470 Référence CVE CVE-2026-0540 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0540 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22029 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22029 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22610 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22610 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22735 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22737 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22737 Référence CVE CVE-2026-2391 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2391 Référence CVE CVE-2026-24051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24051 Référence CVE CVE-2026-26278 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26278 Référence CVE CVE-2026-27601 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27601 Référence CVE CVE-2026-27970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27970 Référence CVE CVE-2026-2950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2950 Référence CVE CVE-2026-32141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-32141 Référence CVE CVE-2026-33186 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-33186 Référence CVE CVE-2026-33228 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2026-23231 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23234 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23234 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23235 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23235 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23236 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23237 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23238 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23239 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23240 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23745 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23745 Référence CVE CVE-2026-2391 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2391 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23949 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23950 Référence CVE CVE-2026-24001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24001 Référence CVE CVE-2026-24049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24049 Référence CVE CVE-2026-24051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24051 Référence CVE CVE-2026-24733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24733 Référence CVE CVE-2026-24734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24734 Référence CVE CVE-2026-24842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=C

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0281Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Splunk

d?id=CVE-2026-20166 Référence CVE CVE-2026-21226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21226 Référence CVE CVE-2026-21925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21925 Référence CVE CVE-2026-21932 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21932 Référence CVE CVE-2026-21933 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21933 Référence CVE CVE-2026-21945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21945 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22795 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22796 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23745 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23745 Référence CVE CVE-2026-2391 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2391 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23950 Référence CVE CVE-2026-24842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24842 Référence CVE CVE-2026-26981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26981 Gestion détaillée du document le 12 mars 2026 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gouv.fr france.fr info.gouv.fr/risques Premier Ministre / Secrétariat Général de la Défense et de la Sécurité Nationale / Agence nationale de la sécurité des sys

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-004874qs projectのqsにおける入力確認に関する脆弱性

qs の arrayLimit オプションは、comma: true が有効な場合にカンマ区切りの値に対する制限を適切に適用しないため、攻撃者が大量のメモリを消費してサービス拒否(DoS)を引き起こす可能性があります。これはカンマ区切り文字列を配列として解析する際に制限チェックが正しく行われないことが原因であり、単一のパラメータから任意に大きな配列を作成できるため、メモリ割り当てが過剰に消費されます。この問題により arrayLimit の制限を回避でき、サービスの可用性に影響が及ぶ恐れがあります。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
6.7.0 ≤ 6.14.1
Fixed
An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 12 Feb 2026 · Last source change 12 Feb 2026, 17:32 UTC · CWE-20 · Improper Input Validation

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-6720
Product sourceUnavailable
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD enriched

Missing structured fields: affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-2391 · cve.blacktree.nl