BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-7424High confidence

Libxslt: type confusion in xmlnode.psvi between stylesheet and source nodes

GNOME · libxslt

7.5HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 1.24% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs GNOME libxslt and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

5 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelibxsltVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1.1.35-1.2+deb13u1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 8 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelibxsltVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1.1.35-1+deb12u2Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 8 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelibxsltVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1.1.35-2Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 8 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelibxsltVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1.1.35-2Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 8 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelibxsltVendor fix publishedCanonical reports that a fixed source package version has been published. Repository candidate availability is not checked by BlackTree.1.1.39-0exp1ubuntu0.24.04.3Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
CVE-2025-7424 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 26 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2025-7424
15 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SLES 15 SP1 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP2 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP3 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP4 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP5 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP1 CHOST Images for Google
  • SLES 15 SP2 CHOST Images for Google
  • SLES 15 SP3 CHOST Images for Google
  • SLES 15 SP4 CHOST Images for Google
  • SLES 15 SP5 CHOST Images for Google
  • SLES 15 SP1 CHOST Images for Microsoft Azure
  • SLES 15 SP2 CHOST Images for Microsoft Azure
Summary
A flaw was found in the libxslt library. The same memory field, psvi, is used for both stylesheet and input data, which can lead to type confusion during XML transformations. This vulnerability allows an attacker to crash the application or corrupt memory. In some cases, it may lead to denial of service or unexpected behavior.
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
CVE-2025-7424 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitylibxslt: Type confusion in xmlNode.psvi between stylesheet and source nodes
4 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • libxslt as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • libxslt-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • libxslt-python as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • libxslt.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Summary
A flaw was found in the libxslt library. The same memory field, psvi, is used for both stylesheet and input data, which can lead to type confusion during XML transformations. This vulnerability allows an attacker to crash the application or corrupt memory. In some cases, it may lead to denial of service or unexpected behavior.
Remediation
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-20995

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

A flaw was found in the libxslt library. The same memory field, psvi, is used for both stylesheet and input data, which can lead to type confusion during XML transformations. This vulnerability allows an attacker to crash the application or corrupt memory. In some cases, it may lead to denial of service or unexpected behavior.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
7.5 · CVSS 3.1
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

A flaw was found in the libxslt library. The same memory field, psvi, is used for both stylesheet and input data, which can lead to type confusion during XML transformations. This vulnerability allows an attacker to crash the application or corrupt memory. In some cases, it may lead to denial of service or unexpected behavior.

What

A flaw was found in the libxslt library. The same memory field, psvi, is used for both stylesheet and input data, which can lead to type confusion during XML transformations. This vulnerability allows an attacker to crash the application or corrupt memory. In some cases, it may lead to denial of service or unexpected behavior.

Why

The product allocates or initializes a resource such as a pointer, object, or variable using one type, but it later accesses that resource using a type that is incompatible with the original type.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

A flaw was found in the libxslt library. The same memory field, psvi, is used for both stylesheet and input data, which can lead to type confusion during XML transformations. This vulnerability allows an attacker to crash the application or corrupt memory. In some cases, it may lead to denial of service or unexpected behavior.

Why

The product allocates or initializes a resource such as a pointer, object, or variable using one type, but it later accesses that resource using a type that is incompatible with the original type.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion') → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-843 ↗

CWE-843: Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion'). The product allocates or initializes a resource such as a pointer, object, or variable using one type, but it later accesses that resource using a type that is incompatible with the original type.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedDenial of serviceCWE-843
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-20995Official EUVD mapping

A flaw was found in the libxslt library. The same memory field, psvi, is used for both stylesheet and input data, which can lead to type confusion during XML transformations. This vulnerability allows an attacker to crash the application or corrupt memory. In some cases, it may lead to denial of service or unexpected behavior.

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-0005NetApp Data ONTAP: Schwachstelle ermöglicht Manipulation von Daten und Denial of Service

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann eine Schwachstelle in NetApp Data ONTAP ausnutzen, um Daten zu manipulieren, und um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1672Apple macOS Sequoia, Sonoma und Ventura: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Apple macOS Sequoia, Sonoma und Ventura ausnutzen, um Root-Rechte zu erlangen, beliebigen Code auszuführen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen, vertrauliche Informationen preiszugeben, Daten zu verändern oder Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1668Apple iOS und iPadOS: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Apple iOS und Apple iPadOS ausnutzen, um Informationen offenzulegen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen und um weitere, nicht spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu verursachen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1287Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs (libxslt): Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1683Apple Safari: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Apple Safari ausnutzen, um Informationen offenzulegen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen, um einen Cross-Site Scripting Angriff durchzuführen, und um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250716Security Bulletin 16 Jul 2025 [922 KB]

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 16 Jul 2025 [922 KB], published on 16 July 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

ecord?id=CVE-2025-68750 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68972 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68973 Référence CVE CVE-2025-69418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69418 Référence CVE CVE-2025-69419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69419 Référence CVE CVE-2025-69420 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69420 Référence CVE CVE-2025-69421 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69421 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6965 Référence CVE CVE-2025-7039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7039 Référence CVE CVE-2025-7424 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7424 Référence CVE CVE-2025-7425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7425 Référence CVE CVE-2025-7545 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7545 Référence CVE CVE-2025-7546 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7546 Référence CVE CVE-2025-8058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8058 Référence CVE CVE-2025-8176 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8176 Référence CVE CVE-2025-8177 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8177 Référence CVE CVE-2025-8194 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8194 Référence CVE CVE-2025-8224 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8224 Ré

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0112Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

ERecord?id=CVE-2025-65637 Référence CVE CVE-2025-65945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-65945 Référence CVE CVE-2025-66418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66418 Référence CVE CVE-2025-66471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66471 Référence CVE CVE-2025-67499 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-67499 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68973 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6966 Référence CVE CVE-2025-7039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7039 Référence CVE CVE-2025-7339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-7424 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7424 Référence CVE CVE-2025-8291 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8291 Référence CVE CVE-2025-8713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8713 Référence CVE CVE-2025-8714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8714 Référence CVE CVE-2025-8715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8715 Référence CVE CVE-2025-8885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8885 Référence CVE CVE-2025-8916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8916 Référence CVE CVE-2025-8959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8959 Référence CVE CVE-2025-9086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9086 Ré

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0069Multiples vulnérabilités dans Oracle Java SE

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans Oracle Java SE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, un déni de service à distance et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0969Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61985 Référence CVE CVE-2025-62171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62171 Référence CVE CVE-2025-62813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62813 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6297 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6297 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6395 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6395 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6638 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6638 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6921 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6921 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6965 Référence CVE CVE-2025-7039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7039 Référence CVE CVE-2025-7424 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7424 Référence CVE CVE-2025-7425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7425 Référence CVE CVE-2025-7709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7709 Référence CVE CVE-2025-7783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7783 Référence CVE CVE-2025-7962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7962 Référence CVE CVE-2025-8058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8058 Référence CVE CVE-2025-8114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-8176 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8176 Référence CVE CVE-2025-8177 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8177 Ré

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0756Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6435 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6436 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6554 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6554 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6555 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6555 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6556 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6556 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6557 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6557 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6558 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6558 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6965 Référence CVE CVE-2025-7339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-7424 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7424 Référence CVE CVE-2025-7425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7425 Référence CVE CVE-2025-7656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7656 Référence CVE CVE-2025-7657 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7657 Référence CVE CVE-2025-7783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7783 Référence CVE CVE-2025-7962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7962 Référence CVE CVE-2025-8010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8010 Référence CVE CVE-2025-8011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8011 Référence CVE CVE-2025-8027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8027 Ré

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0642Multiples vulnérabilités dans Apple Safari

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans Apple Safari. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un déni de service à distance, une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et une injection de code indirecte à distance (XSS). Google indique que la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-6558 est activement exploitée.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0640Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Apple

ord?id=CVE-2025-43267 Référence CVE CVE-2025-43268 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-43268 Référence CVE CVE-2025-43270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-43270 Référence CVE CVE-2025-43273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-43273 Référence CVE CVE-2025-43274 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-43274 Référence CVE CVE-2025-43275 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-43275 Référence CVE CVE-2025-43276 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-43276 Référence CVE CVE-2025-43277 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-43277 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6558 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6558 Référence CVE CVE-2025-7424 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7424 Référence CVE CVE-2025-7425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7425 Gestion détaillée du document le 30 juillet 2025 Version initiale le 31 juillet 2025 Google indique que la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-6558 est activement exploitée. Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gouv.fr france.fr info.gouv.fr/risques Premier Ministre / Secrétariat Général de la Défense et de la Sécurité Nationale / Agence nationale de la sécurité des systèmes d'information

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-012550xmlsoft.org の libxslt 等複数ベンダの製品における型の取り違えに関する脆弱性

xmlsoft.org の libxslt 等複数ベンダの製品には、型の取り違えに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2025-0238Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Apple macOS, iOS en iPadOS

De kwetsbaarheden omvatten verschillende problemen, zoals onvoldoende validatie van invoer, geheugenbeschadiging, en logica-issues die kunnen leiden tot ongeautoriseerde toegang tot gevoelige gebruikersdata. Deze kwetsbaarheden kunnen door kwaadwillenden worden misbruikt om root-rechten te verkrijgen, applicaties te laten crashen, of om toegang te krijgen tot beschermde systeemcomponenten.

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
Fixed
Action
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 10 Jul 2025 · Last source change 1 Sept 2026, 11:47 UTC · CWE-843 · Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-20995
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    < 1.1.44 · Fixed: 0:2.12.5-8.el10_0 < *; 0:1.1.39-8.el10_0 < *; 1.1.45-0.1.hum1 < *
    After
    libxslt: < 1.1.44 · Fixed: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10: 0:2.12.5-8.el10_0 < *, 0:1.1.39-8.el10_0 < *; Red Hat Hardened Images: 1.1.45-0.1.hum1 < *
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Fixed release or patch reference recorded
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-20995↗Vendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-7424 · cve.blacktree.nl